Editorial: Opposite Effects of Genetic Polymorphisms Known to Induce NAFLD on Hepatic and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Chinese Population—authors' Reply

Mingfeng Xia,Xin Gao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.16845
2022-01-01
Abstract:We thank Drs Zhang and Fan for highlighting the importance of our findings and appreciate the opportunity to respond to their concerns.1,2 We totally agree that “geneticrelated nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)” and “metabolicrelated NAFLD” exert different effects on cardiovascular diseases. Compared with the remarkably increased cardiovascular risk in metabolicrelated NAFLD,3 NAFLD caused by PNPLA3 and TM6SF2 gene variants seemed to have no causal relationship with cardiovascular diseases according to previous studies.4 This disparity could be explained by the inverse correlations of PNPLA3 and TM6SF2 gene variants with cardiovascular mortality found in our current study and previously.2,5 PNPLA3 rs738409 gene variant was an important cause of lean NAFLD clinically. Our previous study has revealed that the PNPLA3 gene variants influenced the liver steatosis and serum lipoprotein profiles not only in the overweight/obese people but also the lean people with metabolic dysfunction.6 Therefore, the PNPLA3 gene variant increased the liverspecific mortality and reduced cardiovascular mortality not only in the subgroups of overweight/obese people but also people with diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and metabolic syndrome, regardless of body weight.2 Moreover, our study also indicated that serum VLDL1 triglyceride, a newly recognised liverderived biomarker for metabolic disorders, was regulated by PNPLA3 gene variant and might accurately predict the hepatic and extrahepatic effect of the PNPLA3 gene variant. Lean NAFLD is heterogeneous, which could be caused by a series of risk factors including visceral adiposity, sarcopenia and NAFLDrelated gene variants.7 Although a higher proportion of PNPLA3 gene variant might be found in the lean NAFLD patients, it could only explain the development of NAFLD in a portion of lean people (~30%) at best.8 We found that sarcopenia and central obesity could be diagnosed in a comparable portion (36.5% and 30.7%, respectively) of lean NAFLD patients aged over 45 years from Shanghai Changfeng Study, and the presence of sarcopenia or central obesity was significantly associated with the risk of carotid atherosclerosis1,9 in individuals with NAFLD. Therefore, instead of the genetic risk factors, other clinical risk factors of lean NAFLD, such as central obesity and sarcopenia, might have a dominant effect to determine their mortality from cardiovascular diseases. The menopause status and its related alteration in sex hormones might influence the clinical outcomes of generelated NAFLD as well. Oestrogen in the premenopausal women was found to be protective against the development and progression of NAFLD and cardiovascular diseases.10 It is possible that the effect of the PNPLA3 gene variant on liverspecific and cardiovascular mortality can be affected by individual sex hormone levels. However, in our study population aged averagely of 63.7 years, the number of premenopausal women was too small to identify the protective effect of oestrogen. In conclusion, NAFLDrelated gene variants influenced the hepatic and cardiovascular outcomes in Chinese adults with NAFLD, but these genetic risk factors were not the only determinant of their clinical outcomes. Thus, an accurate prediction of the clinical outcomes of NAFLD patients requires integrating individual genetic and metabolic risk factors.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?