Individualized selection of occluder in interventional treatment of ventricular septal defect (VSD)
管丽华,周达新,葛均波,张蕾,潘文志,陈海燕,姚豪华,孔德红
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-8467.2013.02.003
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To study the application of individualized selection of ventricular septal defect (VSD) occluder in interventional treatment and its efficacy and complications. Methods: One hundred and thirty-seven VSD patients, male 71 cases, female 66 cases, aged 3 to 76 (mean 31.52±16.13) years were enrolled, including perimembraneous VSD (98 cases), muscular VSD (10 cases), intracristal VSD (12 cases), residual shunt after surgical repair of VSD (11 patients), ventricular septal perforation after myocardial infarction (5 cases), and ventricular septal muscular rupture caused by trauma (1 case). Different occluders were selected according to the shape, the size of VSD and the relationship with the aortic and tricuspid valves. The efficacy, complications, size of chambers of heart and pulmonary artery pressure were assessed at 24 hours, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months respectively after procedures. Results: Among 137 cases, 124 were successfully proceed (90.51%) and 126 occluders were used during the procedures with two occluders placed in 2 patients respectively. The occluders were symmetric (26, 20.6%), edge 3 type (18, 14.3%), edge type 4 (44, 34.9%), edge type 5 (13, 10.3%), decentered (14, 11.1%) and muscular (11, 8.7%). Arrhythmia occurred after operation in 29 cases included degree 1 atrioventricular block (AVB), left anterior hemiblock (LAH), complete left bundle branch block (CLBBB), and incomplete right bundle branch block (IRBBB), complete right bundle branch block (CRBBB), supraventricular tarrhythmias. The recovery rate was 96.6%. There was no III-AVB happened. The anteroposterior diameter of the left atrium (LADap) and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVDd) decreased significantly (P=0.001 and 0.002) 24 hours after the procedures. The left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVDs) decreased but change was not statistically significant (P=0.097) 24 hours after the procedures. The LVDs continued to decrease significantly 1 month after procedures (P=0.007). The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) showed no significant difference in pre-process, post-process and follow-up after procedures. The pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) 24 hours after procedures decreased significantly (P=0.001) compared with that before, but there was no further decline 1 month after the procedures (P=0.820). Conclusions: The occluder of the treatment of transcatheter closure of VSD should be chosen individually according to different types of VSD. Thus, we can not only close VSD effectively, but also reduce or avoid the occurrence of iatrogenic complications.