Abstract:The traditional two-dimensional (2D) in vitro cell culture system (on a flat support) has long been used in cancer research. However, this system cannot be fully translated into clinical trials to ideally represent physiological conditions. This culture cannot mimic the natural tumor microenvironment due to the lack of cellular communication (cell-cell) and interaction (cell-cell and cell-matrix). To overcome these limitations, three-dimensional (3D) culture systems are increasingly developed in research and have become essential for tumor research, tissue engineering, and basic biology research. 3D culture has received much attention in the field of biomedicine due to its ability to mimic tissue structure and function. The 3D matrix presents a highly dynamic framework where its components are deposited, degraded, or modified to delineate functions and provide a platform where cells attach to perform their specific functions, including adhesion, proliferation, communication, and apoptosis. So far, various types of models belong to this culture: either the culture based on natural or synthetic adherent matrices used to design 3D scaffolds as biomaterials to form a 3D matrix or based on non-adherent and/or matrix-free matrices to form the spheroids. In this review, we first summarize a comparison between 2D and 3D cultures. Then, we focus on the different components of the natural extracellular matrix that can be used as supports in 3D culture. Then we detail different types of natural supports such as matrigel, hydrogels, hard supports, and different synthetic strategies of 3D matrices such as lyophilization, electrospiding, stereolithography, microfluid by citing the advantages and disadvantages of each of them. Finally, we summarize the different methods of generating normal and tumor spheroids, citing their respective advantages and disadvantages in order to obtain an ideal 3D model (matrix) that retains the following characteristics: better biocompatibility, good mechanical properties corresponding to the tumor tissue, degradability, controllable microstructure and chemical components like the tumor tissue, favorable nutrient exchange and easy separation of the cells from the matrix.

Study of Cancer Cell Malignancy Based on Three-Dimensional Cell Culture Technology

Progress in three-dimensional cell culture and its application in tumor research

3D Microgroove Electrical Impedance Sensing to Examine 3D Cell Cultures for Antineoplastic Drug Assessment

Application of Three-Dimensional Cell Culture Model in Cancer Research

Three-dimensional in Vitro Cancer Models: a Short Review

Biomaterials for Three-Dimensional Cell Culture: From Applications in Oncology to Nanotechnology

Reconstruction of tumor microenvironment via in vitro three-dimensional models

Scaffold-based 3D cell culture models in cancer research

Cancer drug discovery: recent innovative approaches to tumor modeling

Development Of Three-Dimensional Tumor Models For The Study Of Anti-Cancer Drug Effects

3D cell culture systems modeling tumor growth determinants in cancer target discovery

Advances in the bladder cancer research using 3D culture models

Cytotoxic and molecular differences of anticancer agents on 2D and 3D cell culture

Three-Dimensional 3D Culture Models in Gynecological and Breast Cancer Research

A review of the three-dimensional cell culture technique: Approaches, advantages and applications.

3D Cell Culture Systems: Tumor Application, Advantages, and Disadvantages

Dynamic cell culture modulates colon cancer cell migration in a novel 3D cell culture system

Transcending toward Advanced 3D-Cell Culture Modalities: A Review about an Emerging Paradigm in Translational Oncology

Abstract 6015: Comprehensive evaluation of three-dimensional (3D) culture systems as compound screening platforms with primary cancer cell lines

In Vitro Study of Colon Cancer Cell Migration Using E-Jet 3D Printed Cell Culture Platforms.

Towards a New 3Rs Era in the construction of 3D cell culture models simulating tumor microenvironment