Promoter Methylation Profiles of Tumor Suppressor Genes in Lntrahepatic and Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Bin Yang,Mingzhou Guo
2005-01-01
Abstract:Objective To further understand epigenetic alterations in cholangiocarcinoma.Methods We have studied the meth3lation profiles of 12 candidate tumor suppressor genes (APC. E-cadberin/CDHl, MGMT, RASSF1A, GSTP, RAR-β pl4 ARF, p15 INK4b. p16 INK4a, p73, hMLHI annDAPK) in 72 cases ofcholangiocarcinoma, including equal munber cases of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Ten cases of benign biliary epithelia were included as controls. The methylation status of tumor suppressor genes was analyzed using methylation-specific PCR. Results We found that 85% of all cholangiocarcinomas had methylation of at least one tumor suppressor gene. The fi'equency of tumor suppressor gene methylation in cholangiocarcinoma was: RASSF1A (65%), p15 INK4b (50%). p16 INK4a (50%), APC (46%), E-cadherin/CDHl (43%), p14 ARF(38%), p73 (36%), MGMT (33%), hMHLI (25%), GSTP (14%),RAR-β(14%) and DAPK (3%). Although single tumor suppressor gene methylation can be seen in benign biliary epithelium, methylation of multiple tumor suppressor genes is only seen in cholangiocarcinorna. About 70% (50/72) of the cholangiocarcinomas had three or more tumor suppressor genes methylated and 52% (38/72) of cases had lbur or more tumor suppressor genes methylated. Concerted methylafion of multiple tumor suppressor genes was closely associated with methylation of RASSF1,4, pi6 and/or hMHLI. Methylation of RASSF1A was more common in extrahepatic eholangiocarcinoma than intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (83% vs 47%, P=0.003) while GSTP was more frequently seen in intrahepatic compared to extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (31% vs 6%, p 0.012). Our study indicates that methylation of promoter CpG islands of tumor suppressor genes is a common epigenetic event in cholangiocarcinoma. Based on distinct methylation profiles, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma are two closely related but biologically unique neoplastic processes.Conclusions Taking advantage of the unique concurrent methylation profile of multiple genes in cholangiocarcinoma may facilitate the distinction ofcholangiocarcinoma fi'om benign biliary epithelium in clinical settings.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?