Optimal Portfolio with Risk Control

Ye Z,Jian Li

1999-01-01

Abstract:In this paper, we introduce a model of log-optimal portfolio selection with risk constraint. We study the properties of doubling rate-risk function and critical risk and estimate the the maximal and minimal risks. Examples for which the precisely analytic form of doubling rate-risk function is available are provided.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Optimal Capital Allocation Based on Weighted-Mean-Variance Principle

Yuning LI,Yi ZHANG,Jun ZHAO

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13642/j.cnki.42-1184/o1.2018.01.002

2018-01-01

Abstract:This paper investigates the optimal capital allocation problem for dependent risks. The weightedmean-variance model is used to study the existence of the optimal capital allocation and ana-lyzeits performances. Furthermore, we propose the ruin probability as the evaluation criteria to investigate the performances of the corresponding optimal capital solutions from differentmodelsby means ofstochastic simulation. Finally, under the assumption that the dependent risks follow multivariate normal distribution or multivariate tdistribution, the weighted-mean-variance modelis compared with the weightedmean model proposed by Dhaene and the weightedtail mean-variance model proposed by XU and MAO through sim-ulation. The numerical results show that from the aspect of ruin probability, the weightedmean-variance modelin this paper has a better performance.
Dynamic growth-optimum portfolio choice under risk control

Pengyu Wei,Zuo Quan Xu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2112.14451

2021-12-29

Abstract:This paper studies a mean-risk portfolio choice problem for log-returns in a continuous-time, complete market. This is a growth-optimal problem with risk control. The risk of log-returns is measured by weighted Value-at-Risk (WVaR), which is a generalization of Value-at-Risk (VaR) and Expected Shortfall (ES). We characterize the optimal terminal wealth up to the concave envelope of a certain function, and obtain analytical expressions for the optimal wealth and portfolio policy when the risk is measured by VaR or ES. In addition, we find that the efficient frontier is a concave curve that connects the minimum-risk portfolio with the growth optimal portfolio, as opposed to the vertical line when WVaR is used on terminal wealth. Our results advocate the use of mean-WVaR criterion for log-returns instead of terminal wealth in dynamic portfolio choice.

Risk Management,Mathematical Finance,Portfolio Management
The problem of portfolio optimization based on safety-first criteria and the measure of VaR.

LUO Ying,YU Xin,LIU Kang-sheng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1008-9497.2006.05.006

2006-01-01

Abstract:To deal with portfolio selection problem,the paper will get optimal portfolio models according to safety-first criteria under the measure of Value-at-Risk.The results will contribute some theoretical basis for security investors to make correct decisions when selecting the portfolio to meet the satisfaction of the desired safety criteria.
Optimal Investment Strategy for Risky Assets

Sergei Maslov,Yi-Cheng Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219024998000217

1998-07-01

International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance

Abstract:We design an optimal strategy for investment in a portfolio of assets subject to a multiplicative Brownian motion. The strategy provides the maximal typical long-term growth rate of investor's capital. We determine the optimal fraction of capital that an investor should keep in risky assets as well as weights of different assets in an optimal portfolio. In this approach both average return and volatility of an asset are relevant indicators determining its optimal weight. Our results are particularly relevant for very risky assets when traditional continuous-time Gaussian portfolio theories are no longer applicable.
Optimal Investment in a Dual Risk Model

Arash Fahim,Lingjiong Zhu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/risks11020041

2023-02-09

Risks

Abstract:Dual risk models are popular for modeling a venture capital or high-tech company, for which the running cost is deterministic and the profits arrive stochastically over time. Most of the existing literature on dual risk models concentrates on the optimal dividend strategies. In this paper, we propose to study the optimal investment strategy on research and development for the dual risk models to minimize the ruin probability of the underlying company. We will also study the optimization problem when, in addition, the investment in a risky asset is allowed.

English Else
Risk minimization and portfolio diversification

Farzad Pourbabaee,Minsuk Kwak,Traian A. Pirvu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1411.6657

2014-12-16

Abstract:We consider the problem of minimizing capital at risk in the Black-Scholes setting. The portfolio problem is studied given the possibility that a correlation constraint between the portfolio and a financial index is imposed. The optimal portfolio is obtained in closed form. The effects of the correlation constraint are explored; it turns out that this portfolio constraint leads to a more diversified portfolio.

Portfolio Management,Optimization and Control
Portfolio Insurance under a risk-measure constraint

Carmine De Franco,Peter Tankov

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1102.4489

2011-02-22

Abstract:We study the problem of portfolio insurance from the point of view of a fund manager, who guarantees to the investor that the portfolio value at maturity will be above a fixed threshold. If, at maturity, the portfolio value is below the guaranteed level, a third party will refund the investor up to the guarantee. In exchange for this protection, the third party imposes a limit on the risk exposure of the fund manager, in the form of a convex monetary risk measure. The fund manager therefore tries to maximize the investor's utility function subject to the risk measure <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://constraint.We" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a> give a full solution to this nonconvex optimization problem in the complete market setting and show in particular that the choice of the risk measure is crucial for the optimal portfolio to exist. Explicit results are provided for the entropic risk measure (for which the optimal portfolio always exists) and for the class of spectral risk measures (for which the optimal portfolio may fail to exist in some cases).

Risk Management
Risk-averse risk-constrained optimal control

Pantelis Sopasakis,Mathijs Schuurmans,Panagiotis Patrinos

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1903.06749

2019-03-16

Abstract:Multistage risk-averse optimal control problems with nested conditional risk mappings are gaining popularity in various application domains. Risk-averse formulations interpolate between the classical expectation-based stochastic and minimax optimal control. This way, risk-averse problems aim at hedging against extreme low-probability events without being overly conservative. At the same time, risk-based constraints may be employed either as surrogates for chance (probabilistic) constraints or as a robustification of expectation-based constraints. Such multistage problems, however, have been identified as particularly hard to solve. We propose a decomposition method for such nested problems that allows us to solve them via efficient numerical optimization methods. Alongside, we propose a new form of risk constraints which accounts for the propagation of uncertainty in time.

Optimization and Control
Dynamic Mean-LPM and Mean-CVaR Portfolio Optimization in Continuous-time

Jianjun Gao,Ke Zhou,Duan Li,Xiren Cao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1402.3464

2014-02-14

Abstract:Instead of controlling "symmetric" risks measured by central moments of investment return or terminal wealth, more and more portfolio models have shifted their focus to manage "asymmetric" downside risks that the investment return is below certain threshold. Among the existing downside risk measures, the lower-partial moments (LPM) and conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) are probably most promising. In this paper we investigate the dynamic mean-LPM and mean-CVaR portfolio optimization problems in continuous-time, while the current literature has only witnessed their static versions. Our contributions are two-fold, in both building up tractable formulations and deriving corresponding analytical solutions. By imposing a limit funding level on the terminal wealth, we conquer the ill-posedness exhibited in the class of mean-downside risk portfolio models. The limit funding level not only enables us to solve both dynamic mean-LPM and mean-CVaR portfolio optimization problems, but also offers a flexibility to tame the aggressiveness of the portfolio policies generated from such mean - downside risk models. More specifically, for a general market setting, we prove the existence and uniqueness of the Lagrangian multiplies, which is a key step in applying the martingale approach, and establish a theoretical foundation for developing efficient numerical solution approaches. Moreover, for situations where the opportunity set of the market setting is deterministic, we derive analytical portfolio policies for both dynamic mean-LPM and mean-CVaR formulations.

Portfolio Management
Intelligent option portfolio model with perspective of shadow price and risk-free profit

Fengmin Xu,Jieao Ma

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-023-00488-0

IF: 6.793

2023-04-21

Financial Innovation

Abstract:Since Markowitz proposed modern portfolio theory, portfolio optimization has been being a classic topic in financial engineering. Although it is generally accepted that options help to improve the market, there is still an improvement for the portrayal of their unique properties in portfolio problems. In this paper, an intelligent option portfolio model is developed that allows selling options contracts to earn option fees and considers the high leverage of options in the market. Deep learning methods are used to predict the forward price of the underlying asset, making the model smarter. It can find an optimal option portfolio that maximizes the final wealth among the call and put options with multiple strike prices. We use the duality theory to analyze the marginal contribution of initial assets, risk tolerance limit, and portfolio leverage limit for the final wealth. The leverage limit of the option portfolio has a significant impact on the return. To satisfy the investors with different risk preferences, we also give the conditions for the option portfolio to gain a risk-free return and replace the Conditional Value-at-Risk. Numerical experiments demonstrate that the intelligent option portfolio model obtains a satisfactory out-of-sample return, which is significantly positively correlated with the volatility of the underlying asset and negatively correlated with the forecast error of the forward price. The risk- free option model is effective in achieving the goal of no drawdown and gaining satisfactory returns. Investors can adjust the balance point between returns and risks according to their risk preference.

social sciences, mathematical methods,business, finance
Portfolio Optimization with Asset-Liability Ratio Regulation Constraints

De-Lei Sheng,Peilong Shen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1435356

IF: 2.3

2020-03-23

Complexity

Abstract:This paper considers both a top regulation bound and a bottom regulation bound imposed on the asset-liability ratio at the regulatory time T to reduce risks of abnormal high-speed growth of asset price within a short period of time (or high investment leverage), and to mitigate risks of low assets’ return (or a sharp fall). Applying the stochastic optimal control technique, a Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman (HJB) equation is derived. Then, the effective investment strategy and the minimum variance are obtained explicitly by using the Lagrange duality method. Moreover, some numerical examples are provided to verify the effectiveness of our results.

mathematics, interdisciplinary applications,multidisciplinary sciences
Optimal portfolios using linear programming models

C Papahristodoulou,E Dotzauer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601765

IF: 3.6

2004-11-01

Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract:The classical quadratic programming (QP) formulation of the well-known portfolio selection problem has traditionally been regarded as cumbersome and time consuming. This paper formulates two additional models: (i) maximin, and (ii) minimization of mean absolute deviation. Data from 67 securities over 48 months are used to examine to what extent all three formulations provide similar portfolios. As expected, the maximin formulation yields the highest return and risk, while the QP formulation provides the lowest risk and return, which also creates the efficient frontier. The minimization of mean absolute deviation is close to the QP formulation. When the expected returns are confronted with the true ones at the end of a 6-month period, the maximin portfolios seem to be the most robust of all.

management,operations research & management science
Inverse Optimization of Convex Risk Functions

Jonathan Yu-Meng Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3851

IF: 5.4

2021-11-01

Management Science

Abstract:The theory of convex risk functions has now been well established as the basis for identifying the families of risk functions that should be used in risk-averse optimization problems. Despite its theoretical appeal, the implementation of a convex risk function remains difficult, because there is little guidance regarding how a convex risk function should be chosen so that it also well represents a decision maker’s subjective risk preference. In this paper, we address this issue through the lens of inverse optimization. Specifically, given solution data from some (forward) risk-averse optimization problem (i.e., a risk minimization problem with known constraints), we develop an inverse optimization framework that generates a risk function that renders the solutions optimal for the forward problem. The framework incorporates the well-known properties of convex risk functions—namely, monotonicity, convexity, translation invariance, and law invariance—as the general information about candidate risk functions, as well as feedback from individuals—which include an initial estimate of the risk function and pairwise comparisons among random losses—as the more specific information. Our framework is particularly novel in that unlike classical inverse optimization, it does not require making any parametric assumption about the risk function (i.e., it is nonparametric). We show how the resulting inverse optimization problems can be reformulated as convex programs and are polynomially solvable if the corresponding forward problems are polynomially solvable. We illustrate the imputed risk functions in a portfolio selection problem and demonstrate their practical value using real-life data. This paper was accepted by Yinyu Ye, optimization.

management,operations research & management science
A Branch-and-cut Approach to Portfolio Selection with Marginal Risk Control in a Linear Conic Programming Framework

Zhibin Deng,Yanqin Bai,Shu-Cherng Fang,Ye Tian,Wenxun Xing

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-013-5234-5

2013-01-01

Abstract:Marginal risk represents the risk contribution of an individual asset to the risk of the entire portfolio. In this paper, we investigate the portfolio selection problem with direct marginal risk control in a linear conic programming framework. The optimization model involved is a nonconvex quadratically constrained quadratic programming (QCQP) problem. We first transform the QCQP problem into a linear conic programming problem, and then approximate the problem by semidefinite programming (SDP) relaxation problems over some subrectangles. In order to improve the lower bounds obtained from the SDP relaxation problems, linear and quadratic polar cuts are introduced for designing a branch-and-cut algorithm, that may yield an ∈-optimal global solution (with respect to feasibility and optimality) in a finite number of iterations. By exploring the special structure of the SDP relaxation problems, an adaptive branch-and-cut rule is employed to speed up the computation. The proposed algorithm is tested and compared with a known method in the literature for portfolio selection problems with hundreds of assets and tens of marginal risk control constraints.
An overview of optimal control optimization problems driven by non-convexity measures

Weixin Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2012.06111

2020-12-11

Abstract:Recently, literature on dynamic coherent risk measures has broadened the choices for risk-sensitive performance evaluation. A running example includes Cumulative prospect theory and Conditional variance at risk. Most of them can be can be interpreted in general as a non-linear transformation of a given random variable. Non-convexity property has implied a lot of mathematical intricacies and challenges. The paper gives overview on the recent development of dynamic programming optimal control optimization problems driven by non-convex measures.

Optimization and Control
Portfolio Optimization Managing Value at Risk under Heavy Tail Return, using Stochastic Maximum Principle

Subhojit Biswas,Mrinal K.Ghosh,Diganta Mukherjee

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1908.03905

2020-12-01

Abstract:We consider an investor, whose portfolio consists of a single risky asset and a risk free asset, who wants to maximize his expected utility of the portfolio subject to managing the Value at Risk (VaR) assuming a heavy tailed distribution of the stock prices return. We use a stochastic maximum principle to formulate the dynamic optimisation problem. The equations which we obtain does not have any explicit analytical solution, so we look for accurate approximations to estimate the value function and optimal strategy. As our calibration strategy is non-parametric in nature, no prior knowledge on the form of the distribution function is needed. We also provide detailed empirical illustration using real life data. Our results show close concordance with financial <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://intuition.We" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a> expect that our results will add to the arsenal of the high frequency traders.

Portfolio Management,Mathematical Finance
Pessimistic Portfolio Choice with One Safe and One Risky Asset and Right Monotone Probability Difference Order

Jiangfeng Li,Qiong Wu,Zhiqiang Ye,Shunming Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/784275

IF: 1.43

2013-01-01

Mathematical Problems in Engineering

Abstract:As is well known, a first-order dominant deterioration in risk does not necessarily cause a risk-averse investor to reduce his holdings of that deteriorated asset under the expected utility framework, even in the simplest portfolio setting with one safe asset and one risky asset. The purpose of this paper is to derive conditions on shifts in the distribution of the risky asset under which the counterintuitive conclusion above can be overthrown under the rank-dependent expected utility framework, a more general and prominent alternative of the expected utility. Two new criterions of changes in risk, named the monotone probability difference (MPD) and the rightmonotone probability difference (RMPD) order, are proposed, which is a particular case of the first stochastic dominance. The relationship among MPD, RMPD, and the other two important stochastic orders, monotone likelihood ratio (MLR) and monotone probability ratio (MPR), is examined. A desired comparative statics result is obtained when a shift in the distribution of the risky asset satisfies the RMPD criterion.
A novel risk-control model for the online portfolio selection of high-frequency transactions

Bo Li,Qi Wang,Yuan Yu,Meng-Ze Sun,Liang-Xia Chen,Zhong-Liang Xiang,Feng Zhao,Qing-Cong Lv,Zhi-Yong An

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2022.108176

2022-03-01

Abstract:Online portfolio selection (OPS) is an active area of study that has recently attracted the attention of researchers from a diverse range of fields. However, the existing models applied to financial markets typically do not consider incremental learning, asset volatility, and the removal of system noise at the eigenvector level. We first propose a bidirectional incremental learning method, the bidirectional-broad learning system (Bi-BLS), which is more flexible and can conduct OPS in two incremental directions. Then, we propose a new method for removing the noise based on random matrix theory and principal component analysis, which can remove the noise at the eigenvalue and eigenvector levels. Furthermore, two novel risk-control metrics, the Adjusted Sharpe Ratio and the Adjusted Information Ratio, are also proposed to treat asset volatility as risk. These ratios first use asset volatility as the denominator other than the standard deviation of portfolio weights. Finally, a series of experiments are conducted to assess model performance. The results show that the proposed model produces a steady increase in cumulative return and achieves the best performance in terms of final cumulative return. This model also outperforms other models (Best Stork, UBAH, BCRP, UCRP, ONS, PAMR, CWMR, OLMAR, CORN, LOAD, NEW, ALAIT and SNN) as measured by risk-control metrics, such as the Sharpe Ratio, Adjusted Sharpe Ratio, Information Ratio, and Calmar Ratio. Therefore, the proposed model can produce excess returns while effectively controlling risk.

computer science, artificial intelligence
Leptokurtic portfolio theory

R. Kitt,J. Kalda

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2006-00062-8

2006-02-20

The European Physical Journal B

Abstract:Abstract.The question of optimal portfolio is addressed. The conventional Markowitz portfolio optimisation is discussed and the shortcomings due to non-Gaussian security returns are outlined. A method is proposed to minimise the likelihood of extreme non-Gaussian drawdowns of the portfolio value. The theory is called Leptokurtic, because it minimises the effects from “fat tails” of returns. The leptokurtic portfolio theory provides an optimal portfolio for investors, who define their risk-aversion as unwillingness to experience sharp drawdowns in asset prices. Two types of risks in asset returns are defined: a fluctuation risk, that has Gaussian distribution, and a drawdown risk, that deals with distribution tails. These risks are quantitatively measured by defining the “noise kernel” — an ellipsoidal cloud of points in the space of asset returns.The size of the ellipse is controlled with the threshold parameter: the larger the threshold parameter, the larger return are accepted for investors as normal fluctuations. The return vectors falling into the kernel are used for calculation of fluctuation risk. Analogously, the data points falling outside the kernel are used for the calculation of drawdown risks. As a result the portfolio optimisation problem becomes three-dimensional: in addition to the return, there are two types of risks involved. Optimal portfolio for drawdown-averse investors is the portfolio minimising variance outside the noise kernel. The theory has been tested with MSCI North America, Europe and Pacific total return stock indices.

physics, condensed matter
Counter-monotonic risk allocations and distortion risk measures

Mario Ghossoub,Qinghua Ren,Ruodu Wang

2024-07-23

Abstract:In risk-sharing markets with aggregate uncertainty, characterizing Pareto-optimal allocations when agents might not be risk averse is a challenging task, and the literature has only provided limited explicit results thus far. In particular, Pareto optima in such a setting may not necessarily be comonotonic, in contrast to the case of risk-averse agents. In fact, when market participants are risk-seeking, Pareto-optimal allocations are counter-monotonic. Counter-monotonicity of Pareto optima also arises in some situations for quantile-optimizing agents. In this paper, we provide a systematic study of efficient risk sharing in markets where allocations are constrained to be counter-monotonic. The preferences of the agents are modelled by a common distortion risk measure, or equivalently, by a common Yaari dual utility. We consider three different settings: risk-averse agents, risk-seeking agents, and those with an inverse S-shaped distortion function. In each case, we provide useful characterizations of optimal allocations, for both the counter-monotonic market and the unconstrained market. To illustrate our results, we consider an application to a portfolio choice problem for a portfolio manager tasked with managing the investments of a group of clients, with varying levels of risk aversion or risk seeking. We determine explicitly the optimal investment strategies in this case. Our results confirm the intuition that a manager investing on behalf of risk-seeking agents tends to invest more in risky assets than a manager acting on behalf of risk-averse agents.

Risk Management

Optimal Portfolio with Risk Control

Optimal Capital Allocation Based on Weighted-Mean-Variance Principle

Dynamic growth-optimum portfolio choice under risk control

The problem of portfolio optimization based on safety-first criteria and the measure of VaR.

Optimal Investment Strategy for Risky Assets

Optimal Investment in a Dual Risk Model

Risk minimization and portfolio diversification

Portfolio Insurance under a risk-measure constraint

Risk-averse risk-constrained optimal control

Dynamic Mean-LPM and Mean-CVaR Portfolio Optimization in Continuous-time

Intelligent option portfolio model with perspective of shadow price and risk-free profit

Portfolio Optimization with Asset-Liability Ratio Regulation Constraints

Optimal portfolios using linear programming models

Inverse Optimization of Convex Risk Functions

A Branch-and-cut Approach to Portfolio Selection with Marginal Risk Control in a Linear Conic Programming Framework

An overview of optimal control optimization problems driven by non-convexity measures

Portfolio Optimization Managing Value at Risk under Heavy Tail Return, using Stochastic Maximum Principle

Pessimistic Portfolio Choice with One Safe and One Risky Asset and Right Monotone Probability Difference Order

A novel risk-control model for the online portfolio selection of high-frequency transactions

Leptokurtic portfolio theory

Counter-monotonic risk allocations and distortion risk measures