Tumor Vascular Permeability is a Key Determinant for Anti-Vascular Effects of Doxorubicin Encapsulated in a Novel Temperature Sensitive Liposome

Qing Chen,Alex Wight,Sheng Tong,David Needham,Mark W. Dewhirst,Fan Yuan
IF: 11.2
2005-01-01
Cancer Research
Abstract:1392 Doxorubicin (DOX) encapsulated lyso-thermosensitive liposome (LTSL) has shown promising results in tumor growth control when it is combined with hyperthermia (HT). Our previous data have demonstrated that DOX released from LTSL can shut down blood flow in a human tumor xenograft (FaDu) in mice, suggesting that LTSL-DOX is a potential anti-vascular agent. To understand mechanisms of the blood flow shut down, we investigated the effects of LTSL-DOX (5 mg/kg body weight) plus HT (42oC, 1 h) on microcirculation in another tumor (a murine mammary carcinoma, 4T07) implanted in mouse dorsal skin-fold chambers, measured in vitro dose response of tumor (FaDu and 4T07) and endothelial cells to LTSL-DOX or free DOX with or without HT, and quantified the microvascular permeability changes after HT treatment in both tumors. We observed that LTSL-DOX+HT could significantly reduce blood flow in 4T07 tumor, but the amount of reduction was not as much as that in FaDu tumor. This difference was independent of sensitivity of cells to DOX treatment, because the dose responses of FaDu and 4T07 to DOX were similar in vitro. In addition, we observed that LTSL-DOX+HT was more cytotoxic to both tumor cells in vitro than LTSL-DOX without HT and the cytotoxicity of LTSL-DOX+HT was similar to that of free DOX+HT. These data suggested that the killing of tumor cells by LTSL-DOX+HT was caused by both free DOX released from LTSL and the thermal injury. HT increased the microvascular permeability in both tumors; and the amount of increase in FaDu was about eight times as high as that in 4T07. These data indicated that the concentration of LTSL-DOX was higher in FaDu tumors, especially in perivascular regions, than that in 4T07 tumors. Taken together, the difference in the anti-vascular effects of LTSL-DOX+HT between the two tumors was caused by the difference in the microvascular permeability and thus the local concentration of LTSL-DOX in the perivascular regions.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?