Abstract:The abolition of the judicial interpretation issued by the Supreme People's Court of the People's Republic of China in Qi Yuling's case marks the end of the trend of developing a judicial constitutional review system in China, but issues of courts invoking constitutional norms in judicial decisions continue to arise. This essay investigates the actual situation of the Constitution in judicial decisions by categorizing 1907 court decisions that invoked the Constitution as the reasoning basis and the court decisions which invoked the Constitution as the decision-making basis and by exploring the logic of the use of the Constitution by Chinese judges. In the absence of a constitutional review system, the primary sense of Chinese judges invoking constitutional norms is characterized by "simplistic reasoning ", "politicized enforcement " and the "parent law " concept. The insufficient judgment reason is a universal feature of judicial adjudication in Chinese courts. However, due to the lack of a constitutional review system, the poor perception of the interpretation and application of the constitution may exacerbate the lack of legal arguments invoked by the Constitution. The political model of Constitution enforcement in China makes judges invoke the Constitution in judicial decisions by "asserting the prestige of the Constitution ", which leads to numerous errors in legal argumentation in judicial decisions. This also reflects the tendency of "political enforcement " to take precedence over the legal enforcement of the Constitution. The influence of the old "parent law " concept is that judges can arbitrarily apply constitutional norms directly to civil cases, including fundamental rights norms. By summarizing and describing the above three features, we can depict the activities of current Chinese courts in invoking the Constitution.

The Relationship Between Extraterritorial Jurisdiction and Judicial Reform:In the Perspective of the Commission on Extraterritoriality

Transforming the Evaluation of the Rule of Law in China

Assessment of the Rule of Law and Its Application in China

How Do Chinese Judges Invoke the Constitution? Analysis Based on 1907 Decisions

Constrained Power Expansion: China’s Procuratorial Reforms Within and Beyond Criminal Justice

Conditional Justice: Evaluating the Judicial Centralization Reform in China

The People's Court in Transition: the Prospects of the Chinese Judicial Reform

Judicial Independence, Local Protectionism, and Economic Integration: Evidence from China

Tackling Local Protectionism in Enforcing Foreign Arbitral Awards in China: an Empirical Study of the Supreme People's Court's Review Decisions,1995–2015

Suing the Government under Weak Rule of Law: Evidence from Administrative Litigation Reform in China

THE REFORM OF CIVIL ONLINE LITIGATION IN CHINA: DEVELOPMENT AND PREDICAMENTS

International Civil Litigation in China: A Practical Analysis of the Chinese Judicial System

The Limits of Judicial Reforms: How and Why China Failed to Centralize its Court System

Legal Restraints on Compulsory Investigative Measures and Judicial Review

Common Sense and Local Judicatory in Traditional China:Thinking from a Complicated Case

Judicial Transparency As Judicial Centralization: Mass Publicity of Court Decisions in China

The Implementation and Reformation of Administrative Litigation Law in China

International Law in Chinese Courts During the Rise of China

Performance-based Evaluation, State Compensation and Judicial Ecology: Dynamics of China’s Detention Review Practice

Thought of the Improvement in China′s Environmental Public Interests Litigation System

How China’s Supreme People’s Court Supports the Development of Foreign-Related Rule of Law