A Retrospective Study of 64 Medulloblastomas

Gezhi Xu
2005-01-01
Abstract:Objective Sixty-four patients with medulloblastoma treated at a single hospital are presented, with the results, prognostic factors and the most common acute side effect of radiotherapy analyzed. Methods From Jan. 1996 to Apr. 2001, 64 patients with medulloblastoma, by Chang's staging system M0-M1 were admitted for radiotherapy in our hospital after total or sub-total resection of the primary tumor done elsewhere. All patients were over 4 years old. The patients were irradiated with the same technique: 30?Gy delivered to the whole craniospinal axis followed by a 20-25?Gy boost to the posterior fossa, with a median fraction dose of 180?cGy. Results All patients have been followed for at least 3 years or till death. The overall 3-and 5-year survival rates were 68.8% and 55.7% respectively, disease-free survival 57.8% and 51.4%. Twenty-seven (42.2%) patients developed recurrent disease within 3 years. The effect of age, sex, tumor size and interval between surgery and radiation on survival were studied, showing only the interval between surgery and radiation had obvious impact on the patients' survival. Patients whose radiation treatment had been started within 25 days after operation showed a better survival than those beyond the 25th day, with 3-year overall survival of 81.5% and 59.5% (P=0.110)and 3-year disease-free survivals of 74.1% and 46.0% respectively (P=0.030), while relation between survival and age, sex, tumor size was irrelevant. During the course of irradiation, the most common side effect was hematological toxicity, especially the WBC reduction which was observed in 92.2% of patients, with 64.0% of them suffering from grade 2-3 hematological toxicity. Conclusions Surgery plus craniospinal irradiation is able to give a good result for medulloblastoma, though being dwarfed by a high incidence of recurrence. The interval between surgery and radiation is a significant prognostic factor for disease-free survival. Age, sex and tumor size are not. The most common acute side effect is hematological toxicity.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?