An Empirical Study on the Determinants of Korean Firms' Knowledge Transfer to Subsidiaries in China

Jingxun Li

2012-01-01

Abstract:Researchers in international business have long argued that multinational enterprises doing business abroad face costs arising from unfamiliarity of the environment,from political,economics,and cultural difference.In order to overcome liability of foreignness and compete successfully against local firms,multinational enterprises need to provide their subsidiary with some firm-specific advantage,often in the form of organizational and managerial knowledge.Yet,experience shows that transferring knowledge within multinational enterprise is far from easy.The notion that multinational enterprises exist primarily because of their superior ability to engage in internal knowledge transfer does not mean that such knowledge transfer actually take place effectively and efficiently on a routine basis.So,this has triggered a considerable amount of research on factors influencing inter-unit knowledge transfer patterns within the differentiated multinational enterprise.However,the previous literatures have three limitations.First,the previous studies more focus on the knowledge transfer between partners in the international joint venture or strategic alliance from the points of object of the knowledge transfer.Second,the previous studies more focus on overseas subunits operating in developed countries,and few efforts have been made to examine the determinants of knowledge transfer within multinational enterprise in transition economy.Three,with certain notable exceptions,domestic studies about knowledge transfer more focus on literature review or conceptual model design,and neglect empirical study. In this study,therefore,we developed an integrative framework to empirically explore the impact of the antecedents on the knowledge transfer in the context of Korean firms operating in china.In an empirical test of this framework,we found that because of the dependence of a subsidiary on the parent company,the knowledge transferring outcome is influenced not only by the factors related on the subsidiary itself,but also by the factors related to the parent-subsidiary relationship.More specially,our analysis revealed that communication frequency and trust between the headquarters and subsidiary have positive on performance of knowledge transfer.These findings indicate that subsidiary managers may have to make a conscious effort to maintain direct contact via telephone calls,and e-mail exchange to acquire knowledge from headquarters,and mutual trust between units reduce ambiguity to facilitate the exchange of knowledge.In addition,our results show that absorptive capacity plays an important role in helping a subsidiary acquire knowledge from its headquarters.The results also revealed that higher managerial autonomy is positively associated with performance of knowledge transfer.Thus,it seems that high subsidiary autonomy increases customization and localization to facilitate efficiency of knowledge transfer.Lastly,contrary to expectations,our analysis indicated that the use of expatriate managers is not significantly related to outward knowledge transfer from headquarters to subsidiary.We can only speculate on the reasons for this.First,it may be that monitoring subsidiary knowledge transfer is such a small part of expatriate managers' activities that no effect can be seen in the regression analyses.Second,it is possible that extensive use of expatriate managers on short-term assignments in the subsidiary has a negative effect on the development of the long-term,trustful relationships between subsidiaries that are important for extensive competence transfer to take place.