ROC Evaluation of Four ELISAs for Detection of Cattle Serum Antibodies to the Non-Structural Proteins of Foot and Mouth Disease Virus
WANG Huan,ZHANG Run-xiang,LI Di,CAO Yong-sheng,GAO Ming-chun,WANG Jun-wei
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/cjz.j.issn.1002-2694.2013.02.012
2013-01-01
Abstract:The clinical testing effectiveness of four ELISAs for detection of nonstructural protein antibody against the foot-and-mouth disease virus was compared in China in this study and 164 serum samples of bovine were detected.Specificity,sensitivity and the detection rate of the four ELISAs were compared by parallel test and then were compared with Ceditest ELISA kit which was considered as the gold standard.The results were calculated and the receiver-operator characteristic(ROC) curves and Youden index for each test method were subsequently analyzed.Four methods were evaluated again after optimization of optimum threshold value.The results showed that the sensitivity with 3ABC-I-ELISA,Blocking ELISA,3B-Elisa,and 8BF-ELISA which was established in the laboratory were 94.2%(80/85),91.9%(78/85),83.7%(71/85),and 91.9%(78/85),respectively.Specificity of these four were 97.4%(77/79),91.0%(72/79),97.4%(77/79),and 94.9%(75/79),respectively.The detection rate were 95.8%(157/164),91.5%(150/164),90.3%(148/164),and 93.3%(153/164),respectively.For the X2 test,the four ELISAs detection rates had no significant difference(P=0.4610.05).But 3B-Elisa was not suitable for large-scale clinical samples screening test as the sensitivity of it was obvious lower than that of three others.ELISAs optimization after optimal cut-off showed that sensitivity and specificity of the ELISA A,ELISA B,and ELISA D were more than 90%,and with a higher detection rate in experimental serum,which all could be applied to large-scale clinical sample screening test.