THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS ON THE GENETIC DIVERSITY OF GIANT PANDAS BETWEEN LIANGSHAN AND XIAOXIANGLING MOUNTAINS

Fang Shengguo,Feng Wenhe,Anju Zhang
1997-01-01
Abstract:Using the method of labelling giant panda′s DNA fingerprinting probe F 2ZGP96060801 with γ 32 P ATP we have done the comparative detecting and analysis on the genetic diversity of giant pandas between Liangshan and Xiaoxiangling mountains, and the results are as follows. 1.The mean numbers of bands per individual are 28 25 in Liangshan mountain and 33 14 in Xiaoxiangling mountain. The mean allelic frequencies are 0 48 in Liangshan mountain and 0 43 in Xiaoxiangling mountain. The mean heterozygous ratio are 52% in Liangshan mountain and 57% in Xiaoxiangling mountain 2.The mean similarity coefficients of DNA fingerprints are 0 72 in Liangshan mountain and 0 68 in Xiaoxiangling mountain. 3.As a genetic colony, the mean similarity coefficient of DNA fingerprints of giant pandas including two mountains of Liangshan and Xiaoxiangling is 0 58, the mean number of bands per individual is 30 53, the mean allelic frequency is 0 36, and the mean heterozygous ratio is 64%. 4.The parameter of genetic distance of giant pandas is 0 42 between Liangshan mountain and Xiaoxiangling mountain, and there is a obvious genetic differentiation between the giant pandas of Liangshan mountain and Xiaoxiangling mountain. When the genetic unit is one of the mountains, Liangshan or Xiaoxiangling, the genetic similarity of giant pandas among individuals is very high(0 68~0 72) and it is very poor in genetic diversity. If the unit of genetic colony includs two mountains of Liangshan and Xiaoxiangling, there are a marked drop in the genetic similarity among the individuals and rise in genetic diversity. The results above has made known our point of view that as a species the genetic diversity of giant panda is impossibly poor but the genetic colony of each mountain.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?