Abstract:Since b quark mass is not asymptotically large, chirally enhanced corrections which arise from twist-3 wave functions may be important in B decays. We thus evaluate the hadronic matrix elements with the final light pseudoscalar mesons described by leading twist and twist-3 distribution amplitudes. We find that chirally enhanced corrections can be included consistently in the framework of QCD factorization only if the twist-3 distribution amplitudes are symmetric. We then give explicit expressions of api for B → ππ at the next-to-leading order of αs including chirally enhanced corrections. We also briefly discuss the divergence appeared in the hard spectator contributions. PACS numbers 13.25.Hw 12.38.Bx Supported in part by National Natural Science Foundation of China and State Commission of Science and Technology of China Email: duds@alpha02.ihep.ac.cn, yangds@alpha02.ihep.ac.cn, zhugh@alpha02.ihep.ac.cn Mailing address Non-leptonic two-body B decays are crucial for us to extract CKM matrix elements and uncover the origin of CP violations. Experimentally, with the running of B factories, there will accumulate a great amount of data on various B decay channels. Theoretically, however, how to extract CKM matrix elements from non-leptonic B rare decays with modelindependence is still an open question due to the complexity of strong interaction. In the following, we first give a theoretical sketch on non-leptonic B decays. It is well known that the amplitude for the decay B → P1P2 can be expressed as [1]: A(B → P1P2) ∝ ∑ i λiCi(μ)〈P1P2|Qi(μ)|B〉, (1) where λi is a CKM factor, Ci(μ) is a Wilson coefficient which incorporates short distance contributions from strong interactions and therefore is computable by making use of operator product expansion and renormalization group equations, 〈P1P2|Qi(μ)|B〉 is a hadronic matrix element. Obviously, if we want to extract CKM factor from B decays, the hadronic matrix elements should be evaluated reliably. However, due to our ignorance on hadronization, it would be a great challenge to calculate these hadronic matrix elements reliably from first principles. A commonly used approximation is naive factorization assumption, which is based on Bjorken’s color transparency argument [2]: b quark decays and transfers a large momentum to final light quarks, in which two fast-moving, nearly collinear final quarks with appropriate color can be viewed as a small color dipole which will not significantly interact with the soft gluons and finally form an emitted meson. Then we have: 〈P1P2|Qi(μ)|B〉 = 〈P1|J1|0〉〈P2|J2|B〉, (2) where P1 labels the emitted meson and P2 labels another light meson which absorbs the spectator quark from B meson. This approximation completely ignores non-factorizable contributions which connect the emitted meson to the spectator system and expresses the hadronic matrix elements in terms of meson decay constants and form factors. Since decay constants and form factors can be, at least in principle, well determined from other experiments, the branching ratios of non-leptonic B decays are obtained under this assumption. The main deficiency of this approximation is that non-factorizable contributions are completely missing. In consequence, the hadronic matrix elements lose their schemeand scale-dependence. Noting that Wilson coefficients are schemeand scale-dependent, the corresponding decay width will also depend on renormalization scheme and scale which is unphysical. This is a clear indication that non-factorizable contributions, which amount to final-state rescattering and strong interaction phase shift, are important. Several generalizations of naive factorization assumption have been proposed to phenomenologically parameterize non-factorizable contributions. Since this kind of parameterization has no relation to, and therefore does not gain any information from, the underlying QCD dynamics, the resulting predictions on B decays are still model-dependent. In ref [3,4], Beneke, Buchalla, Neubert and Sachrajda proposed a promising QCD factorization method: The hadronic matrix elements 〈P1P2|Qi(μ)|B〉 contain two distinct scale: one is a large scale μ = O(mb), the other is ΛQCD which is the scale of hadronization. In the heavy quark limit, they show that the short distance contributions which are related to the large scale μ = O(mb) can be, at least at one-loop order, separated from the long distance effects and are thus calculable. Furthermore, the long distance effects can be parameterized by light-cone distribution amplitudes and non-perturbative form factors. Thus, the factorization formula can be explicitly expressed as: [3,4] 〈P1P2|Qi|B〉 = F 2(0) 1

Nonresonant Cabibbo suppressed decay B±→π+π-π± and signal for CP violation

F eb 2 00 1 Infrared Divergence and Twist-3 Distribution Amplitudes in QCD Factorization For B →

Revisiting Theb1πandρπdecay Modes of The1

Hadronic Weak Decay $\mathcal{B}_{b}(\frac{1}{2}^+) \to \mathcal{B}(\frac{1}{2}^{+},\; \frac{3}{2}^{+}) +V$

Bcmeson Weak Decays Andcpviolation

$B\to K\bar K(πη)h$ decays in the presence of isovector scalar resonances $a_0(980,1450)$

$$ {B}_c^{-}\To J/\psi \left(\to {\Mu}^{+}{\mu}^{-}\Right){\tau}^{-}\left(\to {\Pi}^{-}{\Nu}_{\tau },{\Rho}^{-}{\Nu}_{\tau },{\Ell}^{-}{\Overline{\nu}}_{\ell }{\nu}_{\tau}\right){\overline{\nu}}_{\tau } $$ Decays with Visible Final-State Kinematics

Tentative estimates of $\mathcal{B}(X(3872)\toπ^0π^0χ_{c1})$ and $\mathcal{B}(X(3872)\toπ^+π^-χ_{c1})$

Publisher’s Note: Branching Fraction for the Doubly-Cabibbo-suppressed Decayd+→k+π0[phys. Rev. D74, 071102 (2006)]

Branching ratios and CP asymmetries of the quasi-two-body decays $B_c \rightarrow \ K^{*}_0(1430,1950) D_{(s)} \rightarrow K πD_{(s)} $ in the PQCD approach

RevisitingB→ Πk,πk* and Ρkdecays: CP Violations and Implication for New Physics

CPAsymmetry Relations Betweenb¯0→ππand

The $$\varvec{\lambda _b\rightarrow \lambda (\rightarrow P\pi ^-)\Mu ^+\mu ^-}$$ Λ B → Λ ( → P Π - ) Μ + Μ - Decay in the Aligned Two-Higgs-doublet Model

Search for the decay

To Understand the Rare Decay Bs → Π+π−ℓ+ℓ−

Revisting B ->Pi K,Pi K* And Rho K Decays: Cp Violations And Implication For New Physics