The Heterogeneity of PD-L1 Expression among the Different Histological Components and Metastatic Lymph Nodes in Patients with Resected Lung Adenosquamous Carcinoma

Yanbiao Liu,Shengxiang Ren,Yingying Peng,Chunyan Wu,Zhenyu Dong,Fengying Wu,Qinrui Tian,Yue Pan,Caicun Zhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx669.001
IF: 51.769
2017-01-01
Annals of Oncology
Abstract:Background: Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) is a predictive factor for anti–PD-1/PD-L1 monoantibodies. However, intertumoral heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression and its accordance between resected tissue and biopsy tissue or cytological tumor samples remains controversial. Methods: A total of 72 patients who consecutively undergone primary lung cancer resection and were diagnosed as pulmonary adenosquamous carcinoma were included. PD-L1 expression level was assessed by IHC (PD-L1: Clone E1L3N; Cell Signaling #13684) in different histological component of both primary and lymph node tissues respectively. Results: With a 5% of cutoff, PD-L1 expression was 20.8%, 33.3% in adenomatous and squamous cell component respectively. When various cutoffs including 0.01, 0.05, 0.10 were used, the PD-L1 expression was discrepant in 26.4%, 19.4%, 12.5% cases respectively. With combination of the expression in tumor cells (TC) and tumor-infiltrated lymphocytes (TILs), discrepancies between two histological components were observed in 13.9%, 22.2%, 30.6% cases repectively. Of 38 lymphatic metastasis cases, there were 4 types of lymphatic node histology including adenocarcinoma, squamous cell, adenosquamous and a mixture of above. By different histological component and cutoff value, the concordances of PD-L1 expression were in 74.1%, 80.0%, 88.9% cases for adenomatous cell component and 90.0%, 80.0%, 85.0% cases for squamous cell component respectively. In addition, the discrepancy of adenocarcinoma histological subtype accounts for the lower concordant rate in adenomatous component.Table: 396OTable 1.1 PD-L1 difference between adenomatous and squamous componentscutoff valuePD-L1 expression in TC in primary tumor siteconcordance (%)adenomatous component PD-L1+ n (%)squamous cell component PD-L1+ n(%)kappa0.0173.632 (44.4)39 (54.2)0.4770.0580.615 (20.8)24 (33.3)0.5270.1087.56 (8.3)11 (15.3)0.407Table 1.2 PD-L1 heterogeneity between adenomatous and squamous components based on tumor cells and TILscutoff valuePD-L1 expression in TC and TILs in primary tumor siteconcordance (%)adenomatous component PD-L1+ n(%)squamous cell component PD-L1+ n(%)kappa0.0169.447(65.3)45(62.5)0.3380.0577.820(27.8)26(36.1)0.4930.1086.17(9.7)11 (15.3)0.370Table 1.3 PD-L1 difference in TC between primary tumor site and lymphatic metastasiscut off valueadenomatous component n = 27squamous cell component n = 20concordanceprimary tumor PD-L1+ n(%)nodal metastasis PD-L1+ n (%)kappaconcordanceprimary tumor PD-L1+ n(%)nodal metastasis PD-L1+ n (%)kappa0.0177.814 (51.9)12 (44.4)0.55790.012 (60.0)12 (60.0)0.7920.0574.19 (33.3)6 (22.2)0.36480.09 (45.0)9 (45.0)0.5960.1088.94 (14.8)3 (11.1)0.50985.05 (25.0)4 (20.0)0.571 Open table in a new tab Conclusions: PD-L1 expression showed a high discrepancy among adenomatous component and squamous cell components. In contrast, PD-L1 was highly consistent between paired histological types of lymph node and the primary lesion, which may suggest that the intrinsic genomic features plays important role in the PDL1 heterogeneously expression. Legal entity responsible for the study: Tongji Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University Funding: Shanghai Municipal Education Commission Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?