Abstract:In social economic decisions, people not only care about their own payoffs but also the payoffs of others, a tendency termed altruistic preference. Numerous studies have shown that the sheer sense of being observed is sufficient to augment subjects' altruistic choices. However, whether subjects' altruistic behavior can be modulated by other stake-holders in the decision context remains unclear. In this study, we provide experimental evidence about the effects of visibility from receivers and social norms on the altruistic preference of the deciders in two studies. First, we confirmed the visibility effect originating from receivers on deciders' altruistic preference in Study 1. In Study 2, we further showed that social norms modulated the effect of behavior visibility on deciders' altruistic preference, suggesting a potential avenue via which social norms influence the relationship between behavioral visibility and altruistic preference. Study 1 implemented a 2 ( visibility: visible vs. invisible) x 2 (reaction type: choice vs. rating) x 2 (inequity aversion: AIA vs. DIA) within-subject design. We recruited 38 participants and they were required to either choose from two reward allocation options (choice task) with another partner, or rate how satisfied concerning a particular allocation (rating task) in a dictator game (DG). Participants' behavior was either observed by their "partners" (visible condition) or remained private (invisible condition). We provided both model-free and model-based evidence for the effects of visibility on altruistic preference. Compared to the invisible condition, participants exhibited greater altruistic preference when their behavior were visible to the receivers (partners). This tendency was significant across both choice and rating tasks. In addition, participants cared more about allocation efficiency in the choice task than in the rating task. Finally, visibility alleviated the behavioral discrepancies between the rating and choice tasks, indicating that social preference and choice strategies tend to converge in the visible condition. Study 2 implemented a 2 (visibility: visible vs. invisible) x 2 ( social norm: altruistic vs. non-altruistic) within- subject design. 53 participants took part in the study with altruistic or non-altruistic social norms. Different social norms were manipulated by presenting the proportions of choosing the unfair options from previous participants: In the altruistic social norm condition, most previous participants chose the option that maximizes others' relative payoffs, while in the non- altruistic condition it was the opposite. Our results showed that in the altruistic social norm condition, visibility significantly increased participants' altruistic preference. However, such effect diminished in the non-altruistic social norm condition. Our study revealed that deciders' behavioral visibility to receivers increased altruistic preference and promoted altruistic behavior. Furthermore, the altruistic social norm played a modulatory role on the visibility effect, supporting the signaling hypothesis of altruistic preference.

Effect of Economic Inequality on Generosity: A Social Norm Perspective

Income and Geographically Constrained Generosity

Revealing the impact of individual income inequality on different types of charitable giving in China through social interactions

Effect of Perceived Economic Mobility and Income on Charitable Behavior

Cross-cultural study of kinship premium and social discounting of generosity

Charity Begins at Home: Cultural Differences in Social Discounting and Generosity

Shaping Future Generosity: the Role of Injunctive Social Norms in Intertemporal Pro-Social Giving

When and why does economic inequality predict prosocial behaviour? Examining the role of interpersonal trust among different targets

Money and flexible generosity

The effect of different types of social norms on children's sharing behavior: The roles of parents, teachers, and peers

Economic inequality breeds corrupt behaviour

Accepting Inequality Deters Responsibility: How Power Distance Decreases Charitable Behavior

Why do people always want more? Perceived economic inequality leads people to be greedy by enhancing relative deprivation

Using social norms to explain giving behavior

Rule-Inequality-Aversion Preference and Conditional Cooperation in Public Goods Experiments: Economic Experiment Evidence from China

Economic Inequality Perception Dampens Meritocratic Belief in China: The Mediating Role of Perceived Distributive Unfairness

Absolute versus Relative Poverty and Wealth: Cooperation in the Presence of Between-Group Inequality

Social Norm Modulates the Enhancement Effect of Behavioral Visibility on Altruistic Preference

Does economic inequality moderate the effect of class on prosocial behavior? A large-scale test of a recent hypothesis by Côté et al

Does Equality Contribute to Prosocial Behavior?