Abstract:Hidden code clones negatively impact software maintenance, but manually detecting them in large codebases is impractical. Additionally, automated approaches find detection of syntactically‐divergent clones very challenging. While recent deep neural networks (for example BERT‐based artificial neural networks) seem more effective in detecting such clones, their pairwise comparison of every code pair in the target system(s) is inefficient and scales poorly on large codebases. We present SSCD, a BERT‐based clone detection approach that targets high recall of Type 3 and Type 4 clones at a very large scale (in line with our industrial partner's requirements). It computes a representative embedding for each code fragment and finds similar fragments using a nearest neighbor search. Thus, SSCD avoids the pairwise‐comparison bottleneck of other neural network approaches, while also using a parallel, GPU‐accelerated search to tackle scalability. This article describes the approach, proposing and evaluating several refinements to improve Type 3/4 clone detection at scale. It provides a substantial empirical evaluation of the technique, including a speed/efficacy comparison of the approach against SourcererCC and Oreo, the only other neural‐network approach currently capable of scaling to hundreds of millions of LOC. It also includes a large in‐situ evaluation on our industrial collaborator's code base that assesses the original technique, the impact of the proposed refinements and illustrates the impact of incremental, active learning on its efficacy. We find that SSCD is significantly faster and more accurate than SourcererCC and Oreo. SAGA, a GPU‐accelerated traditional clone detection approach, is a little better than SSCD for T1/T2 clones, but substantially worse for T3/T4 clones. Thus, SSCD is both scalable to industrial code sizes, and comparatively more accurate than existing approaches for difficult T3/T4 clone searching. In‐situ evaluation on company datasets shows that SSCD outperforms the baseline approach (CCFinderX) for T3/T4 clones. Whitespace removal and active learning further improve SSCD effectiveness.

Tritor: Detecting Semantic Code Clones by Building Social Network-Based Triads Model

Neural Detection of Semantic Code Clones Via Tree-Based Convolution

Code Clone Detection: A Literature Review

SCDetector

Detecting Code Clones with Graph Neural Networkand Flow-Augmented Abstract Syntax Tree

CC2Vec: Combining Typed Tokens with Contrastive Learning for Effective Code Clone Detection

Capturing source code semantics via tree-based convolution over API-enhanced AST

DSFM: Enhancing Functional Code Clone Detection with Deep Subtree Interactions

A novel code representation for detecting Java code clones using high-level and abstract compiled code representations

Detecting Differences Across Multiple Instances of Code Clones

Low-Complexity Code Clone Detection Using Graph-based Neural Networks

Detection of clone sequences and classes using AST

An ensemble learning approach for software semantic clone detection

Gitor: Scalable Code Clone Detection by Building Global Sample Graph

Nearest‐neighbor, BERT‐based, scalable clone detection: A practical approach for large‐scale industrial code bases

GRRLN: Gated Recurrent Residual Learning Networks for code clone detection

A Scalable and Accurate Approach Based on Count Matrix for Detecting Code Clones

Challenging Machine Learning-based Clone Detectors via Semantic-preserving Code Transformations

Code Clone Detection Method for Large-Scale Source Code

Twin-Finder: Integrated Reasoning Engine for Pointer-Related Code Clone Detection

Functional Code Clone Detection with Syntax and Semantics Fusion Learning