513MO Amivantamab Plus Chemotherapy Vs Chemotherapy As a First-Line Treatment among Asian Patients with EGFR Exon 20 Insertion-Mutated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): PAPILLON Subgroup Analysis

C. Zhou,K. Tang,B. Liu,S-W. Kim,S. Kitazono,A. Ono,M. Thiagarajan,J-Y. Hung,M. Boyer,J. Xie,A. Bhattacharya,M. Baig,T. Agrawal,R. E. Knoblauch,B. C. Cho
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2023.10.592
IF: 51.769
2023-01-01
Annals of Oncology
Abstract:Amivantamab (ami) is an EGFR-MET bispecific antibody with immune cell–directing activity. In the global, phase 3 PAPILLON study (NCT04538664), ami and carboplatin-pemetrexed (ami-chemo) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) vs chemo (data submitted to ESMO 2023) in treatment naïve patients (pts) with Ex20ins advanced NSCLC. The incidence of EGFR mutations is higher among Asian pts than other races. Thus, we evaluated ami-chemo vs chemo in Asian pts by race from PAPILLON. Pts were randomized 1:1 to ami-chemo or chemo. The primary endpoint was PFS by blinded independent central review. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), PFS after first subsequent therapy (PFS2), overall survival (OS), and safety. Crossover to ami monotherapy was allowed for pts in the chemo arm who progressed. 186/308 randomized pts were Asian (ami-chemo, 97; chemo, 89); median age was 57/62 years, 56%/58% female, and 21%/25% had a history of brain metastases for ami-chemo/chemo, respectively. At a median follow up of 16.6 months, the median PFS for Asian pts was 11.5 months (95% CI, 9.8–13.7) for ami-chemo vs 5.6 months (95% CI, 4.9–7.0) for chemo (HR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.23–0.49; P<0.001); this was comparable to the overall population. The 18-month PFS rate was 31% for ami-chemo vs 3% for chemo. ORR was 70% (95% CI, 60–79) for ami-chemo vs 51% (95% CI, 40–62) for chemo (odds ratio, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.19–3.93; P=0.012). Median PFS2 was not estimable for ami-chemo vs 18.8 months for chemo (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.26–0.83; P=0.008). Median interim OS was not estimable vs 24.4 months for ami-chemo vs chemo (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.34–1.24; P=0.189) despite crossover among chemo-randomized pts who had progressed. AE rates in Asian pts were similar to the overall PAPILLON population. Most common ami-chemo TEAEs (>50%) were paronychia, neutropenia, rash, anemia, and leukopenia; no new safey signals. Discontinuation of ami due to treatment-related AEs was 8%. Ami-chemo demonstrated superior PFS vs chemo in Asian pts with a tolerable safety profile. These results were consistent with those of the overall population.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?