Metavalent multicenter bonding in pnictogens and chalcogens: nature and mechanism of formation

Hussien H. Osman,Alberto Otero-de-la-Roza,Placida Rodríguez-Hernández,Alfonso Muñoz,Francisco Javier Manjón

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv-2023-pv66p-v2

2023-12-01

Abstract:Due to the exceptional property portfolio and technological applications of phase change materials, mostly chalcogens related to IV-VI and V2-VI3 families, which are in turn related to pnictogens (group V or 15) and chalcogens (group VI or 16), the nature of the unconventional chemical bonding in these materials has been debated for almost 70 years. This unconventional bond, which has been quoted in the literature as resonant, hypervalent, electron-rich multicenter, three-center-four-electron (3c-4e), and metavalent, is believed to be responsible for the exceptional properties of phase change materials. In the last decade, two bonding models, the metavalent and the electron-rich multicenter models, have competed to explain the nature of this unconventional bond, which we have here renamed as metavalent multicenter bond (MMB) for the sake of clarity. In this comprehensive work, we address the nature of MMB and propose that MMB is an electron-deficient multicenter bond (EDMB), related to the threecenter-two-electron (3c-2e) bond. For that purpose, we explore the pressure-induced mechanism of MMB formation in the some of the simplest possible systems, pnictogens (As, Sb, Bi) and chalcogens (Se, Te, Po), with density-functional theory calculations. In the way, we find that polonium is the only element among chalcogens and pnictogens with crystalline α and β structures already exhibiting MMBs at RP. We find that the mechanism of MMB formation in pnictogens (chalcogens) is comprised of three (two) stages, is similar to that of the EDMB formation in B2H6, in some Zintl phases, intermetallics, and cluster compounds, and in atomic/polymeric nitrogen and hydrogen at high pressures. On the other hand, the mechanism of EDMB formation is completely different from that of the 3c-4e bond formation in molecules. Finally, we propose the simplest geometries of EDMBs that can be found in solids along one, two, and three dimensions and comment on the validity of the doublet/octet rules in the hypercoordinated multicenter units with EDMBs.

Chemistry

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper discusses the properties and formation mechanism of metavalent multicenter bonding (MMB) in pnictogens and chalcogens. The author used density-functional theory (DFT) calculations to study the structural, vibrational, and electronic properties changes in the simplest systems of these elements, such as arsenic (As), antimony (Sb), bismuth (Bi), selenium (Se), tellurium (Te), and polonium (Po) under high pressure.

The paper pointed out that metavalent multicenter bonding is considered to be the cause of certain abnormal properties in phase change materials (PCMs), such as violation of the eight-vertex rule, low band gaps, and metallic luster. In the past, this atypical bonding has been described as resonance, hypervalency, and multicenter bonding. In recent years, there have been two main competing modeling theories to explain the properties of this bonding: electron-rich multicenter bonds (ERMB) and metavalent bonds. Although these two models agree on some characteristics of the materials, there is still controversy regarding the nature of this bonding.

The study found that metavalent multicenter bonding may be electron-deficient multicenter bonding (EDMB) related to three-center two-electron bonding (3c-2e), and the formation mechanism is similar to that in boranes and other materials. Through the analysis of the pressure-induced formation process of metavalent multicenter bonding, the authors proposed that the structural transformation of these elements under high pressure, especially the approach to octahedral coordination, is related to the formation of metavalent multicenter bonding.

The paper also emphasized that although pressure is an important tool for understanding the bonding in PCMs, the research on metavalent multicenter bonding is still not comprehensive enough. By studying simple one-dimensional, two-dimensional, and three-dimensional systems, the authors proposed the geometric configurations of EDMB in solids and discussed the applicability of the double valence rule in multicenter units.

In conclusion, this paper aims to address the nature and formation mechanism of metavalent multicenter bonding in pnictogens and chalcogens, as well as how they transform into electron-deficient multicenter bonding under high pressure, thereby deepening the understanding of atypical chemical bonding in phase change materials.