Abstract:Approaches for computing small molecule binding free energies based on molecular simulations are now regularly being employed by academic and industry practitioners to study receptor-ligand systems and prioritize the synthesis of small molecules for ligand design. Given the variety of methods and implementations available, it is natural to ask how the convergence rates and final predictions of these methods compare. In this study, we describe the concept and results for the SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge, the first challenge from the SAMPL series focusing on the assessment of convergence properties and reproducibility of binding free energy methodologies. We provided parameter files, partial charges, and multiple initial geometries for two octa-acid (OA) and one cucurbit[8]uril (CB8) host-guest systems. Participants submitted binding free energy predictions as a function of the number of force and energy evaluations for seven different alchemical and physical-pathway (i.e., potential of mean force and weighted ensemble of trajectories) methodologies implemented with the GROMACS, AMBER, NAMD, or OpenMM simulation engines. To rank the methods, we developed an efficiency statistic based on bias and variance of the free energy estimates. For the two small OA binders, the free energy estimates computed with alchemical and potential of mean force approaches show relatively similar variance and bias as a function of the number of energy/force evaluations, with the attach-pull-release (APR), GROMACS expanded ensemble, and NAMD double decoupling submissions obtaining the greatest efficiency. The differences between the methods increase when analyzing the CB8-quinine system, where both the guest size and correlation times for system dynamics are greater. For this system, nonequilibrium switching (GROMACS/NS-DS/SB) obtained the overall highest efficiency. Surprisingly, the results suggest that specifying force field parameters and partial charges is insufficient to generally ensure reproducibility, and we observe differences between seemingly converged predictions ranging approximately from 0.3 to 1.0 kcal/mol, even with almost identical simulations parameters and system setup (e.g., Lennard-Jones cutoff, ionic composition). Further work will be required to completely identify the exact source of these discrepancies. Among the conclusions emerging from the data, we found that Hamiltonian replica exchange-while displaying very small variance-can be affected by a slowly-decaying bias that depends on the initial population of the replicas, that bidirectional estimators are significantly more efficient than unidirectional estimators for nonequilibrium free energy calculations for systems considered, and that the Berendsen barostat introduces non-negligible artifacts in expanded ensemble simulations.

Do all roads lead to Rome? Convergence issues in umbrella sampling simulations

Do all paths lead to Rome? How reliable is umbrella sampling along a single path?

Combine Umbrella Sampling with Integrated Tempering Method for Efficient and Accurate Calculation of Free Energy Changes of Complex Energy Surface

Estimating Free Energy Surfaces and their Convergence from multiple, independent static and history-dependent biased molecular-dynamics simulations with Mean Force Integration.

The SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge: assessing the reliability and efficiency of binding free energy calculations

An Efficient Umbrella Potential for the Accurate Calculation of Free Energies by Molecular Simulation.

Improving the Efficiency of Non-equilibrium Sampling in the Aqueous Environment via Implicit-Solvent Simulations.

Estimating Free-Energy Surfaces and Their Convergence from Multiple, Independent Static and History-Dependent Biased Molecular-Dynamics Simulations with Mean Force Integration

Machine Learning and Enhanced Sampling Simulations for Computing the Potential of Mean Force and Standard Binding Free Energy

On achieving high accuracy and reliability in the calculation of relative protein–ligand binding affinities

Estimating the ligand‐binding affinity via λ‐dependent umbrella sampling simulations

Convergence Criteria for Single-step Free-energy Calculations: The Relation between the Π Bias Measure and the Sample Variance

Scalable Indirect Free Energy Method Applied to Divalent Cation-Metalloprotein Binding

Sampling free energy surfaces as slices by combining umbrella sampling and metadynamics

Assessing the performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 10. Impacts of enhanced sampling and variable dielectric model on protein-protein Interactions

Concurrent and Adaptive Extreme Scale Binding Free Energy Calculations

Enhanced Sampling with Sub-optimal Collective Variables: Reconciling Accuracy and Convergence Speed

Comparing the Performance of Different AMBER Protein Forcefields, Partial Charge Assignments, and Water Models for Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculations

Combining Alchemical Transformation with Physical Pathway to Accurately Compute Absolute Binding Free Energy

Identifying and Overcoming the Sampling Challenges in Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations of a Model Protein:Protein Complex