Association of weekday-to-weekend sleep duration pattern with myocardial infarction: analysis of the NHANES 2017- 2020
N Kulthamrongsri,K Kulthamrongsri,T Yinadsawaphan,P Wattanachayakul,P Nuchpramool,S Treewaree,R Buahung,P Danpanichkul,T Sodsri,T Numwong,E Tantisattamo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.2666
IF: 39.3
2024-10-29
European Heart Journal
Abstract:Background Short sleep is linked to increased acute myocardial infarction (MI) risk.However, the association of weekend-to-weekday sleep patterns with MI in a nationally representative population remains unknown. The goal is to investigate how weekday and weekend sleep durations affect myocardial infarction (MI) in the general population, and if longer weekend sleep can offset insufficient weekday sleep's effects. Methods A cross-sectional study utilized data from the 2017-2020 NHANES to examine the relationship between sleep patterns and MI. Participants self-reported their average sleep durations on weekdays (1) and weekends (2), along with the calculated weekend-to-weekday sleep duration ratio (SDR) (3). Logistic regression models, adjusting for various factors, including demographics and comorbidities, were employed to analyze the association. Those with SDR > 1 had more weekend sleep, while an SDR = 1 indicated equal sleep durations. Results The study involved 9,205 adult participants, with a mean ± SD age of 68.8 ± 10.8 years and 30.7% being female. Among them, 4.65% (428 patients) had a history of MI. The mean ± SD of weekday and weekend sleep hours was 7.6 ± 1.7 and 8.3 ± 1.8 hours, respectively. For weekday sleep duration, after univariate analysis, individuals compared to those in Q1 were statistically significant 0.72 times less likely in Q2 and 1.4 times more likely in Q4 to experience MI . While MI was 0.76 times less likely to occur among participants in Q3, it was not statistically significant (95% CI Q2: 0.54, 0.96; Q4: 1.05, 1.76; Q3:0.57, 1.00). After adjusting, participants only in Q3 were statistically significant 0.71 times less likely to develop MI.(Q3: 95% CI 0.51, 0.99). For weekend sleep duration, the univariate analysis showed that individuals in Q2, Q3, and Q4 were significantly less likely to experience MI (OR = 0.63, 0.67, and 0.69; 95% CIs: 0.48-0.82, 0.51-0.87, 0.53-0.90, respectively) After adjusting, only participants in Q2 were statistically significant less likely to develop MI (OR = 0.71; 95% CI 0.52 - 0.96). For the weekend-to-weekday sleep duration ratio (SDR), after univariate analysis, individuals were statistically significant 0.54 times less likely, and 1.5 times more likely to experience MI in those whose SDR is more than 1, and those whose SDR equals 1, respectively (95% CI SDR > 1: 1.14, 1.98; SDR = 1: 0.39, 0.72). After adjusting, participants with SDR more than 1 were statistically significant 0.69 times less likely to develop MI. Conclusions Moderate sleep durations on weekdays (in Q3), weekends (in Q2), along with SDR more than 1, were negatively linked with MI in a general population. This implies that sleep durations on both weekends and weekdays have comparable associations with MI. Additionally, full recovery sleep on weekends following sleep-deprived weekdays, might reduce MI risk. Further studies are needed to explore impact of weekend and weekday sleep patterns on MI.Histogram and Margins plotTable of Odd ratios
cardiac & cardiovascular systems