1134: Renal Cell Carcinoma and Renal Angiomyolipoma: Differentiation with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound
Zuofeng Xu,Xiaoyan Xie,Huixiong Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2009.06.517
IF: 3.694
2009-01-01
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
Abstract:PurposeTo differentiated renal cell carcinoma (RCC) from renal angiomyolipoma (RAML) by contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) features.Materials and MethodsOne hundred and nineteen patients underwent CEUS. enhancement pattern and extent of tumors, and enhancement changes of tumors were recorded.ResultsOn CEUS, Washing out from hyper- or iso-enhancement to hypo-enhancement over time (observed in 3.0% of RAMLs and 71.0% of RCCs; P<0.001) , heterogeneous enhancement (observed in 12.1% of RAMLs and 74.2% of RCCs; P<0.001) and perilesional enhanced rim (observed in 3.0% of RAMLs and 79.6% of RCCs; P<0.001) were valuable predictors for differentiating RCC from RAML. The highest diagnostic efficacy was obtained by using early washout enhancement and heterogeneous enhancement or peritumoral rim enhancement as the diagnostic criteria of CEUS for differentiating RCC from RAML. The corresponding sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy and J value of Youden index were 88.2%, 97.0%, 98.8%, 74.4%, 90.5% and 0.852, respectively.ConclusionCEUS is potentially useful in differentiating RCC from RAML. PurposeTo differentiated renal cell carcinoma (RCC) from renal angiomyolipoma (RAML) by contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) features. To differentiated renal cell carcinoma (RCC) from renal angiomyolipoma (RAML) by contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) features. Materials and MethodsOne hundred and nineteen patients underwent CEUS. enhancement pattern and extent of tumors, and enhancement changes of tumors were recorded. One hundred and nineteen patients underwent CEUS. enhancement pattern and extent of tumors, and enhancement changes of tumors were recorded. ResultsOn CEUS, Washing out from hyper- or iso-enhancement to hypo-enhancement over time (observed in 3.0% of RAMLs and 71.0% of RCCs; P<0.001) , heterogeneous enhancement (observed in 12.1% of RAMLs and 74.2% of RCCs; P<0.001) and perilesional enhanced rim (observed in 3.0% of RAMLs and 79.6% of RCCs; P<0.001) were valuable predictors for differentiating RCC from RAML. The highest diagnostic efficacy was obtained by using early washout enhancement and heterogeneous enhancement or peritumoral rim enhancement as the diagnostic criteria of CEUS for differentiating RCC from RAML. The corresponding sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy and J value of Youden index were 88.2%, 97.0%, 98.8%, 74.4%, 90.5% and 0.852, respectively. On CEUS, Washing out from hyper- or iso-enhancement to hypo-enhancement over time (observed in 3.0% of RAMLs and 71.0% of RCCs; P<0.001) , heterogeneous enhancement (observed in 12.1% of RAMLs and 74.2% of RCCs; P<0.001) and perilesional enhanced rim (observed in 3.0% of RAMLs and 79.6% of RCCs; P<0.001) were valuable predictors for differentiating RCC from RAML. The highest diagnostic efficacy was obtained by using early washout enhancement and heterogeneous enhancement or peritumoral rim enhancement as the diagnostic criteria of CEUS for differentiating RCC from RAML. The corresponding sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy and J value of Youden index were 88.2%, 97.0%, 98.8%, 74.4%, 90.5% and 0.852, respectively. ConclusionCEUS is potentially useful in differentiating RCC from RAML. CEUS is potentially useful in differentiating RCC from RAML.