Abstract:Deep neural networks (DNNs) have been shown lack of robustness, as they are vulnerable to small perturbations on the inputs. This has led to safety concerns on applying DNNs to safety-critical domains. Several verification approaches based on constraint solving have been developed to automatically prove or disprove safety properties for DNNs. However, these approaches suffer from the scalability problem, i.e., only small DNNs can be handled. To deal with this, abstraction based approaches have been proposed, but are unfortunately facing the precision problem, i.e., the obtained bounds are often loose. In this paper, we focus on a variety of local robustness properties and a (δ,ε) -global robustness property of DNNs, and investigate novel strategies to combine the constraint solving and abstraction-based approaches to work with these properties: We propose a method to verify local robustness, which improves a recent proposal of analyzing DNNs through the classic abstract interpretation technique, by a novel symbolic propagation technique. Specifically, the values of neurons are represented symbolically and propagated from the input layer to the output layer, on top of the underlying abstract domains. It achieves significantly higher precision and thus can prove more properties. We propose a Lipschitz constant based verification framework. By utilising Lipschitz constants solved by semidefinite programming, we can prove global robustness of DNNs. We show how the Lipschitz constant can be tightened if it is restricted to small regions. A tightened Lipschitz constantcan be helpful in proving local robustness properties. Furthermore, a global Lipschitz constant can be used to accelerate batch local robustness verification, and thus support the verification of global robustness. We show how the proposed abstract interpretation and Lipschitz constant based approaches can benefit from each other to obtain more precise results. Moreover, they can be also exploited and combined to improve constraints based approach. We implement our methods in the tool PRODeep, and conduct detailed experimental results on several benchmarks

Certifying Semantic Robustness of Deep Neural Networks

Measuring Robustness of Deep Neural Networks from the Lens of Statistical Model Checking.

SoK: Certified Robustness for Deep Neural Networks

Guiding the Comparison of Neural Network Local Robustness: an Empirical Study

Towards Certifying the Asymmetric Robustness for Neural Networks: Quantification and Applications

Certifying Global Robustness for Deep Neural Networks

Improving adversarial robustness of deep neural networks by using semantic information

CC-CERT: A Probabilistic Approach to Certify General Robustness of Neural Networks

A Survey of Neural Network Robustness Assessment in Image Recognition

Towards Certified Probabilistic Robustness with High Accuracy

Enhancing Robustness Verification for Deep Neural Networks Via Symbolic Propagation

Semantically Consistent Visual Representation for Adversarial Robustness

Analyzing Adversarial Robustness of Deep Neural Networks in Pixel Space: a Semantic Perspective

General Lipschitz: Certified Robustness Against Resolvable Semantic Transformations via Transformation-Dependent Randomized Smoothing

Globally-Robust Neural Networks

Towards Certifying L Robustness Using Neural Networks with L-Dist Neurons

Certified Adversarial Robustness Under the Bounded Support Set.

Measuring Neural Net Robustness with Constraints

Semidefinite relaxations for certifying robustness to adversarial examples

Tightening Robustness Verification of Convolutional Neural Networks with Fine-Grained Linear Approximation.

Certifying Robustness of Convolutional Neural Networks with Tight Linear Approximation