Abstract:Interpretability and stability are two important features that are desired in many contemporary big data applications arising in economics and finance. While the former is enjoyed to some extent by many existing forecasting approaches, the latter in the sense of controlling the fraction of wrongly discovered features which can enhance greatly the interpretability is still largely underdeveloped in the econometric settings. To this end, in this paper we exploit the general framework of model-X knockoffs introduced recently in Candès, Fan, Janson and Lv (2018), which is nonconventional for reproducible large-scale inference in that the framework is completely free of the use of p-values for significance testing, and suggest a new method of intertwined probabilistic factors decoupling (IPAD) for stable interpretable forecasting with knockoffs inference in high-dimensional models. The recipe of the method is constructing the knockoff variables by assuming a latent factor model that is exploited widely in economics and finance for the association structure of covariates. Our method and work are distinct from the existing literature in that we estimate the covariate distribution from data instead of assuming that it is known when constructing the knockoff variables, our procedure does not require any sample splitting, we provide theoretical justifications on the asymptotic false discovery rate control, and the theory for the power analysis is also established. Several simulation examples and the real data analysis further demonstrate that the newly suggested method has appealing finite-sample performance with desired interpretability and stability compared to some popularly used forecasting methods.

On "Imputation of Counterfactual Outcomes When the Errors Are Predictable": Viewing the PUP as the DID and the LDV

Imputation of Counterfactual Outcomes when the Errors are Predictable

Discussion of "Imputation of Counterfactual Outcomes when the Errors are Predictable" by Sílvia Gonçalves and Serena Ng

Imputation of Counterfactual Outcomes when the Errors are Predictable: Rejoinder

On "Imputation of Counterfactual Outcomes when the Errors are Predictable": Discussions on Misspecification and Suggestions of Sensitivity Analyses

Counterfactual Imputation: Comments on "Imputation of Counterfactual Outcomes when the Errors are Predictable" by Silvia Gonçalves and Serena Ng

A Bracketing Relationship between Difference-in-Differences and Lagged-Dependent-Variable Adjustment

Counterfactual Mediation Analysis with a Latent Class Exposure

A Bracketing Relationship for Long-Term Policy Evaluation with Combined Experimental and Observational Data

A Unified Inference for Predictive Quantile Regression

Another look at inference after prediction

IPAD: Stable Interpretable Forecasting with Knockoffs Inference

Assessing the causes of continuous effects by posterior effects of causes

Predicting the Unpredictable under Subjective Expected Utility

Imputation for prediction: beware of diminishing returns

Assumption-Lean Post-Integrated Inference with Negative Control Outcomes

Partial counterfactual identification and uplift modeling: theoretical results and real-world assessment

Model-Agnostic Covariate-Assisted Inference on Partially Identified Causal Effects

Robust Design and Evaluation of Predictive Algorithms under Unobserved Confounding

When is IV identification agnostic about outcomes?