Abstract:The arms race between attacks and defenses for machine learning models has come to a forefront in recent years, in both the security community and the privacy community. However, one big limitation of previous research is that the security domain and the privacy domain have typically been considered separately. It is thus unclear whether the defense methods in one domain will have any unexpected impact on the other domain. In this paper, we take a step towards resolving this limitation by combining the two domains. In particular, we measure the success of membership inference attacks against six state-of-the-art defense methods that mitigate the risk of adversarial examples (i.e., evasion attacks). Membership inference attacks determine whether or not an individual data record has been part of a model's training set. The accuracy of such attacks reflects the information leakage of training algorithms about individual members of the training set. Adversarial defense methods against adversarial examples influence the model's decision boundaries such that model predictions remain unchanged for a small area around each input. However, this objective is optimized on training data. Thus, individual data records in the training set have a significant influence on robust models. This makes the models more vulnerable to inference attacks. To perform the membership inference attacks, we leverage the existing inference methods that exploit model predictions. We also propose two new inference methods that exploit structural properties of robust models on adversarially perturbed data. Our experimental evaluation demonstrates that compared with the natural training (undefended) approach, adversarial defense methods can indeed increase the target model's risk against membership inference attacks. When using adversarial defenses to train the robust models, the membership inference advantage increases by up to 4.5 times compared to the naturally undefended models. Beyond revealing the privacy risks of adversarial defenses, we further investigate the factors, such as model capacity, that influence the membership information leakage.

Stolen Risks of Models with Security Properties

Extracting Robust Models with Uncertain Examples

Unawareness detection: Discovering black-box malicious models and quantifying privacy leakage risks

Privacy Risks of Securing Machine Learning Models against Adversarial Examples

Physics-Constrained Robustness Verification of Intelligent Security Assessment for Power Systems

SecurityNet: Assessing Machine Learning Vulnerabilities on Public Models

Towards the Science of Security and Privacy in Machine Learning

Learning Security Classifiers with Verified Global Robustness Properties

Mind Your Weight(s): A Large-scale Study on Insufficient Machine Learning Model Protection in Mobile Apps

The security of machine learning in an adversarial setting: A survey

Robustness Quantification Method for Network Intrusion Detection Models

Trade-offs between membership privacy & adversarially robust learning

Making models more secure: An efficient model stealing detection method

Differentially Private Optimizers Can Learn Adversarially Robust Models

Privacy Threats and Protection in Machine Learning

Defending Against Model Stealing Via Verifying Embedded External Features

Data-Driven Security Analysis of Machine Learning Systems

Pareto-Secure Machine Learning (PSML): Fingerprinting and Securing Inference Serving Systems

SecureML: A System for Scalable Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning

LSSMSD: Defending Against Black-Box DNN Model Stealing Based on Localized Stochastic Sensitivity

I Know What You Trained Last Summer: A Survey on Stealing Machine Learning Models and Defences