Molecular Mechanism of the Interaction between p53 and numb protein in colorectal cancer

张辉,祝丽宇,叶颖江,周静
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn421213-20230301-01061
2023-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To explore the interaction and co localization of p53 protein and Numb protein in colorectal cancer, and to observe the structural domains of their interaction and their impact on the proliferation cycle of colorectal cancer cells.Methods:Colon cancer cell lines HCT116 (+ ) and HCT116 (-) (p53 wild-type and p53 deletion type, respectively) were used as research subjects. Gene overexpression (Transfer) and RNA interference (RNAi) were used, respectively. Immunoprecipitation assay (CoIP) was used to detect the endogenous interaction between p53 and Numb protein, and GST Pull down was used to detect the domains of direct interaction between the two, Use flow cytometry to detect the effect of p53/Numb on the proliferation cycle of colon cancer cells.Results:Immunoprecipitation experiments were conducted using p53 and Numb antibodies, and p53 and Numb proteins could co precipitate with each other. In order to further clarify the segments of Numb mediated interaction with p53, four segments of Numb segmented plasmids with GST tags were constructed, and their binding to p53 was verified using GST Pull down technology. They are full length plasmids 1-592 and segmented plasmids 1-264, 92-353, and 352-592, respectively. The results showed that the full-length Numb and 92-353 can interact with p53, while 1-264 has weak binding ability with p53, indicating that the domain of the 92-353 segment of Numb is necessary for the binding of Numb to p53. In HCT116 (p53 + ), the effect of p53 RNA interference is opposite; In p53 + cells, after transferring to Numb, there was a G 2-M phase arrest in the cell cycle. The percentage content of DNA in the S and G 2/M phases of the control group was 1.78 and 1.62 ( t=4.116, P<0.05), respectively, compared to the experimental group. The proliferation was inhibited (4.2% vs. 15.6%, t=3.821, P<0.01). However, after transferring to Numb in p53-, there was also a G 2-M phase arrest, and the proliferation level decreased, but the effect was weaker than in HCT116 (+ ). Conclusion:Through the interaction and co localization with Numb protein, p53 in colon cancer cells may affect the proliferation cycle of colon cancer cells, laying a new experimental foundation for exploring the functional mechanism of their interaction in colon cancer.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?