Review of Low-cost Self-driving Laboratories: The "Frugal Twin" Concept

Stanley Lo,Sterling Baird,Joshua Schrier,Ben Blaiszik,Sergei Kalinin,Helen Tran,Taylor Sparks,Alán Aspuru-Guzik,Maria Politi,Benji Maruyama,Andrés Aguilar-Granda,Nessa Carson,Ian Foster
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv-2023-6z9mq-v2
2023-11-16
Abstract:This review proposes the concept of a “frugal twin,” similar to a digital twin, but for physical experiments. Frugal twins range from simple toy examples to low-cost surrogates of high-cost research systems. For example, a color-mixing self-driving laboratory (SDL) can serve as a low-cost version of a costly multi-step chemical discovery SDL. Frugal twins already provide hands-on experience for SDLs with low costs and low risks. They can also offer as test beds for software prototyping (e.g., optimization, data infrastructure), and a low barrier to entry for democratizing SDLs. However, there is room for improvement. The true value of frugal twins can be realized in three core areas. Firstly, hardware and software modularity; secondly, purpose-built design (human-inspired vs. hardware-centric vs. human-in-the-loop); and thirdly state-of-the-art (SOTA) software (e.g., multi-fidelity optimization). We also describe the ethical benefits and risks that come with the democratization of science through frugal twins. For future work, we suggest ideas for new frugal twins, SDL educational course outcomes, and a classification scheme for autonomy levels.
Chemistry
What problem does this paper attempt to address?