Abstract:BackgroundWith the development of computational literacy, there has been a surge in both research and practice application of text-based and block-based modalities within the field of computer programming education. Despite this trend, little work has actually examined how learners engaging in programming process when utilizing these two major programming modalities, especially in the context of secondary education settings.ObjectivesTo further compare programming effects between and within text-based and block-based modalities, this research conducted a quasi-experimental research in China's secondary school.MethodsAn online programming platform, Code4all, was developed to allow learners to program in text-based and block-based modalities. This research collected multimodal data sources, including programming platform data, process data, and performance data. This research further utilized multiple learning analytics approaches (i.e., clustering analysis, click stream analysis, lag-sequential analysis and statistics) to compare learners' programming features, behavioural patterns and knowledge gains under two modalities.Results and ConclusionsThe results indicated that learners in text-based modality tended to write longer lines of code, encountered more syntactical errors, and took longer to attempt debugging. In contrast, learners in block-based modality spent more time operating blocks and attempt debugging, achieving better programming knowledge performances compared to their counterparts. Further analysis of five clusters from the two modalities revealed discrepancies in programming behavioural patterns.ImplicationsThree major pedagogical implications were proposed based on empirical research results. Furthermore, this research contributed to the learning analytics literature by integrating process-oriented and summative analysis to reveal learners' programming learning quality. What is currently known about the subject matterThe implications of study findings for practitionersProgramming has the potential to improve learners' higher-order thinking skills.Block-based and text-based modalities are two major instructional methods.There has been a growing interest to understand how learning occurs in two modes.Most previous work has evaluated two modalities based on learners' knowledge, skills, and attitudes.What this paper addsCode4all allows learners to programming in text-based and block-based modalities.Quasi-experimental research was conducted to examine block-based and text-based programming modalities.Multimodal learning analytics were used to compare programming under two modalities.Learners' programming features, behaviouralbehavioral patterns, and knowledge gains were identified under two modalities.Instructors should integrate text-based and block-based modalities into programming courses.Process-oriented assessment should be integrated with summative assessment.Adaptive, timely scaffoldings should be provided with the external support (this should be marked like above two points).Instructors should integrate text-based and block-based modalities into programming courses.Process-oriented assessment should be integrated with summative assessment.Adaptive, timely scaffoldings should be provided with the external support (this should be marked like above two points).

Transitioning from Introductory to Professional Programming in Secondary Education: Comparing Learners’ Computational Thinking Skills, Behaviors, and Attitudes

Using Multimodal Learning Analytics to Understand Effects of Block-Based and Text-Based Modalities on Computer Programming

Three Contrasting Pairs’ Collaborative Programming Processes in China’s Secondary Education

Block-based Versus Text-Based Programming: a Comparison of Learners’ Programming Behaviors, Computational Thinking Skills and Attitudes Toward Programming

Single or Combined? A Study on Programming to Promote Junior High School Students’ Computational Thinking Skills

Programming Attitudes Predict Computational Thinking: Analysis of Differences in Gender and Programming Experience.

Using Learning Analytics in Understanding Students' Behavior in Block-based and Text-based Programming Modality

The Influence and Relationship between Computational Thinking, Learning Motivation, Attitude, and Achievement of Code.org in K-12 Programming Education

Different Programming Approaches on Primary Students’ Computational Thinking: a Multifactorial Chain Mediation Effect

Interaction Patterns During Block-based Programming Activities Predict Computational Thinking: Analysis of the Differences in Gender, Cognitive Load, Spatial Ability, and Programming Proficiency

Comparative Experiment of the Effects of Unplugged and Plugged-in Programming on Computational Thinking in Primary School Students: A Perspective of Multiple Influential Factors

Effects of Gamified Python Programming on Primary School Students’ Computational Thinking Skills: A Differential Analysis of Gender

Comparing Learners’ Knowledge, Behaviors, and Attitudes Between Two Instructional Modes of Computer Programming in Secondary Education

Exploring children’s perceptions of developing twenty-first century skills through computational thinking and programming

Computational thinking with game design: An action research study with middle school students

Exploring Age and Gender Differences of Computational Thinkers in Primary School: A Developmental Perspective

Does Text-Based Programming Improve K-12 Students’ CT Skills? Evidence from a Meta-Analysis and Synthesis of Qualitative Data in Educational Contexts

From Critique to Computational Thinking: A Peer-Assessment-Supported Problem Identification, Flow Definition, Coding, and Testing Approach for Computer Programming Instruction

Effect of Jigsaw‐integrated Task‐driven Learning on Students' Motivation, Computational Thinking, Collaborative Skills, and Programming Performance in a High‐school Programming Course

Fostering Computational Thinking and Problem-Solving in Programming: Integrating Concept Maps Into Robot Block-Based Programming

Teacher Change Following a Professional Development Experience in Integrating Computational Thinking into Elementary Science