Abstract:China has adopted a transfer-based fiscal decentralisation scheme since the mid-1990s. In the 1994 tax sharing reform, the central government significantly raised its share of government revenue vis-a-vis local governments by taking most of the newly created value-added tax on manufacturing. One aim for the adoption of the transfer-based fiscal scheme was to channel more funds to less developed regions and rural areas, and to alleviate growing interregional inequality and urban-rural income disparity. In 2002 and 2003 the Chinese central government further grabbed 50% and 60%, respectively, of the income taxes previously assigned only to local governments while providing more fiscal transfers to the country's poor regions and the countryside. Utilising the 2002-2003 change in China's central-local tax sharing regime as an exogenous policy shock, we employ a Simulated Instrumental Variable approach to causally evaluate the effects of the policy shock on growth, interregional inequality and urban-rural disparity. We find the lower local tax share dis-incentivised local governments and led to lower growth. Although higher central transfers helped to reduce interregional inequalities in per capita GDP and per capita income, the equalising effects were only present for urban incomes. We argue that transfer-based decentralisation without bottom-up accountability was detrimental to economic growth and had limited impact on income redistribution.

Revenue Sharing, Fiscal Incentives, and Economic Growth: Evidence from China

Expansionary Fiscal Spending among Chinese Local Governments:Observations and Explanations

Fiscal Decentralization and Regional Economic Growth:Empirical Evidence below the Provincial Level

Fiscal Decentralization and China’s Provincial Economic Growth: a Panel Data Analysis for China’s Tax Sharing System

Regional Decentralization and Fiscal Incentives: Federalism, Chinese Style

Fiscal Decentralisation and Local Economic Growth: Evidence from a Fiscal Reform in China

Fiscal Decentralization and Local Public Good Provision in China

Transfer-based decentralisation, economic growth and spatial inequality: Evidence from China’s 2002–2003 tax sharing reform:

Land Fiscal and Local Public Goods Provision: Evidences from Cities

Fiscal Incentives, Competition, and Investment in China

Fiscal Incentives and Sustainable Urbanization: Evidence from China

Decentralization, incentives, and local tax enforcement

China's fiscal decentralization and environmental quality: theory and an empirical study

Chinese Style Decentralization and Shared Development

Fiscal Decentralization, Local Governments' Behavior and Regional Financial Development

Fiscal Decentralization,Market Segmentation and Economy Growth:Based on Analysis of Provincial Panel Data of 1996-2007

Giving Priority to Efficiency with Due Consideration to Fairness and Incentive Effect of Fiscal Decentralization

Retesting of the Relationship between Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth in China

THE FENSHUIZHI REFORM,FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION,AND ECONOMIC GROWTH IN CHINA

Green economic development under the fiscal decentralization system: Evidence from china