Exploring Reactivity and Regioselectivity of Dimerization of Paramagnetic Endohedral Metallofullerenes
Lihong Wang,Yang Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c01448
IF: 4.6
2020-07-21
Inorganic Chemistry
Abstract:Due to their radical character, paramagnetic endohedral metallofullerenes (EMFs) are prone to dimerize. The dimerization exhibits high selectivity, i.e., only one or a few dimer structures, among a great number of possible choices of carbon cage forms and reaction sites, were observed in experiments. To unravel the determining factors of dimerization selectivity, we conducted a systematic computational study of the dimerization of a series of experimentally synthesized paramagnetic EMFs, representatively including <sub>82</sub> (M = Y, Sc, La), <sub>72</sub> with adjacent pentagons, and Y<sub>2</sub>@C<sub>80</sub> in triplet state. By exploring many possible monomer structures and all possible dimerization sites for each monomer, we can explain the unique dimer structure of <sub>82</sub> observed in the experiment. Thereby, we suggest two energetic criteria to determine whether a dimer structure can be formed under certain synthetic conditions: the monomer precursor should be sufficiently stable and the dimerization process should be sufficiently exergonic. Furthermore, we show that commonly used reactivity descriptors, based on different physical arguments such as spin density, geometric characteristics, aromaticity, and bond orders, all have poor or no correlation with the dimerization regioselectivity of EMFs. Conversely, we propose a simple hydride model able to quantitatively predict the relative dimer energies, which would serve as reliable and general guidance for the dimerization of EMFs and their derivatives.. The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c01448?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c01448</a>.Basis set convergence tests; comparison between DFT and double-hybrid DFT results; comparison between NBO, Mulliken, and Hirschfeld spin densities; comparison between different variations of hydride model; correlation of <i>E</i><sub class="stack">dimer</sub><sup class="stack">rel</sup> with some other reactivity descriptors for regioisiomers of dimer <b>f</b> of <sub>82</sub>; change of metal position after dimerization and hydrogenation of isomer <b>i</b> of <sub>82</sub>; MBFO analysis for dimers <sub>82</sub>; intercage bond length vs dimerization energy and relative energy for dimers <sub>82</sub> (M = Y, Sc, La); correlation between Δ<i>E</i> and Δ<i>G</i>, and between <i>E</i><sub class="stack">dimer</sub><sup class="stack">rel</sup> and <i>G</i><sub class="stack">dimer</sub><sup class="stack">rel</sup> for <sub>82</sub> (M = Y, Sc, La); correlation of conventional reactivity descriptors with Δ<i>E</i> and <i>E</i><sub class="stack">dimer</sub><sup class="stack">rel</sup> for <sub>82</sub> (M = Y, Sc, La); dimerization energy and hydrogenation energy by full geometry optimization for <sub>82</sub>; correlation of conventional reactivity descriptors with <i>E</i><sub class="stack">dimer</sub><sup class="stack">rel</sup> for <i>C</i><sub>2</sub>(10612)-C<sub>72</sub>; Schlegel diagram of Y<sub>2</sub>@<i>I</i><sub><i>h</i></sub>(7)-C<sub>80</sub>; relocation of metal atoms in Y<sub>2</sub>@<i>I</i><sub><i>h</i></sub>(7)-C<sub>80</sub> upon hydrogenation; correlation of conventional reactivity descriptors with <i>E</i><sub class="stack">dimer</sub><sup class="stack">rel</sup> for Y<sub>2</sub>@<i>I</i><sub><i>h</i></sub>(7)-C<sub>80</sub>; and absolute energies and optimized geometries of some selected EMF dimers and their corresponding monomers (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c01448/suppl_file/ic0c01448_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.
chemistry, inorganic & nuclear