The Escape and Capture of the Contingent: A Solution to Kripke's Puzzle of "Physical Necessity"

Jianjun Zhang

2023-01-01

Abstract:Saul Kripke raised the question of whether "physical necessity", or "theoretical identity", is the necessity in the highest degree in his Naming and Necessity published in 1972, but it remained unsolved in the second edition (1980), and no definitive answer has ever been given since then. This paper shows that this was because Kripke's conception of modal essentialism had not yet stepped out of the dilemma of self-deconstruction. The author demonstrates that the fundamental difference of "entity-entity connection" and "entity-attribute connection" can be derived if we examine the analysis of the "contingent escape puzzle": The Paradox of Normal Modal Set Theory. The distinction of non-logical necessity and contingent on which modal essentialism stands is only meaningful with respect to entity-attribute connection. The author presents a solution to Kripke's Puzzle of "Physical Necessity" based on the "dual meaning" of the physical necessity statement, which could not only make Kripke's conception coherent, but also hopefully shed lights to contemporary studies on modal epistemology and modal logic.