Abstract:Vulnerabilities publicly disclosed in the National Vulnerability Database (NVD) are assigned with CVE (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures) IDs and associated with specific software versions. Many organizations, including IT companies and government, heavily rely on the disclosed vulnerabilities in NVD to mitigate their security risks. Once a software is claimed as vulnerable by NVD, these organizations would examine the presence of the vulnerable versions of the software and assess the impact on themselves. However, the version information about vulnerable software in NVD is not always reliable. Nguyen et al. find that the version information of many CVE vulnerabilities is spurious and propose an approach based on the original SZZ algorithm (i.e., an approach to identify bug-introducing commits) to assess the software versions affected by CVE vulnerabilities. However, SZZ algorithms are designed for common bugs, while vulnerabilities and bugs are different. Many bugs are introduced by a recent bug-fixing commit, but vulnerabilities are usually introduced in their initial versions. Thus, the current SZZ algorithms often fail to identify the inducing commits for vulnerabilities. Therefore, in this study, we propose an approach based on an improved SZZ algorithm to refine software versions affected by CVE vulnerabilities. Our proposed SZZ algorithm leverages the line mapping algorithms to identify the earliest commit that modified the vulnerable lines, and then considers these commits to be the vulnerability-inducing commits, as opposed to the previous SZZ algorithms that assume the commits that last modified the buggy lines as the inducing commits. To evaluate our proposed approach, we manually annotate the true inducing commits and verify the vulnerable versions for 172 CVE vulnerabilities with fixing commits from two publicly available datasets with five C/C++ and 41 Java projects, respectively. We find that 99 out of 172 vulnerabilities whose version information is spurious. The experiment results show that our proposed approach can identify more vulnerabilities with the true inducing commits and correct vulnerable versions than the previous SZZ algorithms. Our approach outperforms the previous SZZ algorithms in terms of F1-score for identifying vulnerability-inducing commits on both C/C++ and Java projects (0.736 and 0.630, respectively). For refining vulnerable versions, our approach also achieves the best performance on the two datasets in terms of F1-score (0.928 and 0.952).

Neural SZZ Algorithm.

Enhancing Bug-Inducing Commit Identification: A Fine-Grained Semantic Analysis Approach

V-SZZ: Automatic Identification of Version Ranges Affected by CVE Vulnerabilities

Evaluating SZZ Implementations: An Empirical Study on the Linux Kernel

On Refining the SZZ Algorithm with Bug Discussion Data

Automatic Defect Categorization Based on Fault Triggering Conditions

Automated Bug Report Field Reassignment and Refinement Prediction

The Impact of Mislabeled Changes by SZZ on Just-in-Time Defect Prediction.

An empirical study of issue-link algorithms: which issue-link algorithms should we use?

SZZ in the time of Pull Requests

Learning a Static Bug Finder from Data

PR-SZZ: How pull requests can support the tracing of defects in software repositories

Evaluating SZZ Implementations Through a Developer-informed Oracle

Problems with SZZ and Features: An empirical study of the state of practice of defect prediction data collection

A Comparative Study of Supervised Learning Algorithms for Re-opened Bug Prediction.

Identifying Defect-Inducing Changes in Visual Code

High-Impact Bug Report Identification with Imbalanced Learning Strategies

Automated Identification of High Impact Bug Reports Leveraging Imbalanced Learning Strategies

Neural Program Repair with Program Dependence Analysis and Effective Filter Mechanism

SpeedNeuzz: Speed Up Neural Program Approximation with Neighbor Edge Knowledge

Learning Unified Features from Natural and Programming Languages for Locating Buggy Source Code