Abstract:Background: Ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) has demonstrated good outcomes for patients with ulnar impaction syndrome. To minimize complications such as non-union, precise osteotomy and firm fixation are warranted. Despite various ulnar shortening systems have been developed, current technology does not meet all needs. A considerable portion of patients could not afford those designated USO systems. To tackle this challenge, our team reported successful results in standardized free-hand predrilled USO technique. However, it is still technical demanding and requires sufficient experience and confidence to excel. Therefore, our team designed an ulnar shortening system based on our free-hand technique principle, using metal additive manufacturing technology. The goal of this study is to describe the development process and report the performance of the system. Methods: Utilizing metal additive manufacturing technology, our team developed an ulnar shortening system that requires minimal exposure, facilitates precise cutting, and allows for the easy placement of a 3.5 mm dynamic compression plate, available to patients at zero out-of-pocket cost. For performance testing, two surgeons with different levels of experience in ulnar shortening procedures were included: one fellow-trained hand and wrist surgeon and one senior resident. They performed ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) using both the free-hand technique and the USO system-assisted technique on ulna sawbones, repeating each method three times. The recorded parameters included time-to-complete-osteotomy, total procedure time, chip diameter, shortening length, maximum residual gap, and deviation angle. Results: For the hand and wrist fellow, with the USO system, the time-to-complete osteotomy was significantly reduced. (468.7 ± 63.6 to 260.0 ± 5 s, p < 0.05). Despite the preop goal was shortening 3 mm, the average shortening length was significantly larger in the free-hand group (5 ± 0.1; 3.2 ± 0.2 mm, p < 0.05). Both maximum residual gap and deviation angle reported no statistical difference between the two techniques for the hand surgeon. As for the senior resident, the maximum residual gap was significantly reduced, using the USO system (2.9 ± 0.8; 0.4 ± 0.4 mm, p = 0.02). Between two surgeons, significant larger maximum residual gap and deviation angle were noted on the senior resident doctor, in the free-hand technique group, but not in the USO system group. Conclusion: The developed USO system may serve as a valuable tool, aiding in reliable and precise cutting as well as fixation for patients undergoing ulnar shortening osteotomy with a 3.5 mm dynamic compression plate, even for less experienced surgeons. The entire process, from concept generation and sketching to creating the CAD file and final production, serves as a translatable reference for other surgical scenarios.

A Comment on 'ulnar Shortening Osteotomy Vs. Wafer Resection for Ulnar Impaction Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis'.

Arthroscopic wafer procedure versus ulnar shortening osteotomy for ulnar impaction syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Comparative Study of Ulnar-Shortening Osteotomy, Arthroscopy Wafer Procedure, and Distal Metaphyseal Ulnar-Shortening Osteotomy for Ulnar Impaction Syndrome

Clinical Study of Wrist Arthroscopy Combined with Oblique Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy in the Treatment of Ulnar Impaction Syndrome

A Modified Partial Wedge-Shaped Metaphyseal Ulnar Osteotomy for the Treatment of Ulnar Impaction Syndrome with Reverse Oblique Sigmoid Notch.

Combined Arthroscopic Wafer Procedure and Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Debridement versus Ulnar Shortening Diaphyseal Osteotomy in Management of Ulnar Impaction Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Arthroscopic Distal Metaphyseal Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy for Ulnar Impaction Syndrome: A Different Technique

Ulnar Impaction Syndrome: Ulnar Shortening vs. Arthroscopic Wafer Procedure

Influence Of The Infrapatellar Fat Pad Resection During Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis

Comparison of diaphyseal and metaphyseal ulnar shortening osteotomies for the treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome

Effect of different ulnar osteotomies on loading of the distal radioulnar joint: a finite element analysis

Deprivation: explaining differences in mortality between Scotland and England and Wales.

Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Ulnar Impaction Syndrome (2024)

Arthroscopic Wafer Procedure for Ulnar Impaction Syndrome in an Intact Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex

Positive or Negative Ulnar Variance after Ulnar Shortening for Ulnar Impaction Syndrome: A Retrospective Study

Is ulnar shortening osteotomy effective for the treatment of ulnar styloid impaction syndrome compared to ulnar impaction syndrome?

Intraoperative Arthroscopic Findings of Ulnar Impaction Syndrome

Modified anterior approach for treatment of ulnar coronoid process fracture

Comparison of ulnar shortening osteotomy for idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome using conventional or ulnar osteotomy plates and with or without interfragmentary screw fixation

Enabling the design of surgical instruments for under-resourced patients through metal additive manufacturing: ulnar shortening osteotomy as an example

Outcomes of Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy with an Intramedullary Bone Graft for Idiopathic Ulnar Impaction Syndrome