Mass Spectra for Qcq¯c¯ ,

Wei Chen,Hua-Xing Chen,Xiang Liu,T. G. Steele,Shi-Lin Zhu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.96.114017
2017-01-01
Abstract:We have studied the mass spectra of the hidden-charm/bottom $qc\overline{q}\overline{c}$, $sc\overline{s}\overline{c}$ and $qb\overline{q}\overline{b}$, $sb\overline{s}\overline{b}$ tetraquark states with ${J}^{PC}={0}^{++}$ and ${2}^{++}$ in the framework of QCD sum rules. We construct ten scalar and four tensor interpolating currents in a systematic way and calculate the mass spectra for these tetraquark states. The ${X}^{*}(3860)$ may be either an isoscalar tetraquark state or ${\ensuremath{\chi}}_{c0}(2P)$. If the ${X}^{*}(3860)$ is a tetraquark candidate, our results prefer the ${0}^{++}$ option over the ${2}^{++}$ one. The $X(4160)$ may be classified as either the scalar or tensor $qc\overline{q}\overline{c}$ tetraquark state, while the $X(3915)$ favors a ${0}^{++}\text{ }\text{ }qc\overline{q}\overline{c}$ or $sc\overline{s}\overline{c}$ tetraquark assignment over the tensor one. The $X(4350)$ cannot be interpreted as a $sc\overline{s}\overline{c}$ tetraquark with either ${J}^{PC}={0}^{++}$ or ${2}^{++}$.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?