Observation of the Decays B_(s)^0 → D S 1 (2536) ∓ K ±

D. Bacher
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/jhep10(2023)106
IF: 6.379
2023-01-01
Journal of High Energy Physics
Abstract:This paper reports the observation of the decays B_(s)^0 → Ds1(2536)∓K± using proton-proton collision data collected by the LHCb experiment, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 9 fb−1. The branching fractions of these decays are measured relative to the normalisation channel B0 → D 0K+K−. The Ds1(2536)− meson is reconstructed in the D *(2007)0K− decay channel and the products of branching fractions are measured to be [ ℬ(B_s^0→D_s1(2536)^∓K^±)×ℬ(D_s1(2536)^-→D^∗(2007)^0K^-); =(2.49± 0.11± 0.12± 0.25± 0.06)×10^-5,; ℬ(B^0→D_s1(2536)^∓K^±)×ℬ(D_s1(2536)^-→D^∗(2007)^0K^-); =(0.510± 0.021± 0.036± 0.050)×10^-5. ] The first uncertainty is statistical, the second systematic, and the third arises from the uncertainty of the branching fraction of the B0 → D 0K+K− normalisation channel. The last uncertainty in the B_s^0 result is due to the limited knowledge of the fragmentation fraction ratio, fs/fd. The significance for the B_s^0 and B0 signals is larger than 10 σ. The ratio of the helicity amplitudes which governs the angular distribution of the Ds1(2536)− → D *(2007)0K− decay is determined from the data. The ratio of the S- and D-wave amplitudes is found to be 1.11 ± 0.15 ± 0.06 and the phase difference between them 0.70 ± 0.09 ± 0.04 rad, where the first uncertainty is statistical and the second systematic.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?