Abstract:Abstract The $$R(D^{(*)})$$ R(D(∗)) anomalies observed in $$B\rightarrow D^{(*)}\tau \nu $$ B→D(∗)τν decays have attracted much attention in recent years. In this paper, we study the $$B\rightarrow D^{(*)}\tau \nu $$ B→D(∗)τν , $$\Lambda _b\rightarrow \Lambda _c\tau \nu $$ Λb→Λcτν , $$B_c\rightarrow (J/\psi ,\,\eta _c)\tau \nu $$ Bc→(J/ψ,ηc)τν , $$B\rightarrow X_c\tau \nu $$ B→Xcτν , and $$B_c\rightarrow \tau \nu $$ Bc→τν decays, all being mediated by the same quark-level $$b\rightarrow c\tau \nu $$ b→cτν transition, in the Standard Model Effective Field Theory. The most relevant dimension-six operators for these processes are $$Q_{lq}^{(3)}$$ Qlq(3) , $$Q_{ledq}$$ Qledq , $$Q^{(1)}_{lequ}$$ Qlequ(1) , and $$Q^{(3)}_{lequ}$$ Qlequ(3) in the Warsaw basis. Evolution of the corresponding Wilson coefficients from the new physics scale $$\Lambda =1$$ Λ=1 TeV down to the characteristic scale $$\mu _b\simeq m_b$$ μb≃mb is performed at three-loop in QCD and one-loop in EW/QED. It is found that, after taking into account the constraint $${{\mathcal {B}}}(B_c\rightarrow \tau \nu )\lesssim 10\%$$ B(Bc→τν)≲10% , a single $$\left[ C_{lq}^{(3)}\right] _{3323}(\Lambda )$$ Clq(3)3323(Λ) or $$\left[ C^{(3)}_{lequ}\right] _{3332}(\Lambda )$$ Clequ(3)3332(Λ) can still be used to resolve the $$R(D^{(*)})$$ R(D(∗)) anomalies at $$1\sigma $$ 1σ , while a single $$\left[ C^{(1)}_{lequ}\right] _{3332}(\Lambda )$$ Clequ(1)3332(Λ) is already ruled out by the measured $$R(D^{(*)})$$ R(D(∗)) at more than $$3\sigma $$ 3σ . By minimizing the $$\chi ^2(C_i)$$ χ2(Ci) function constructed based on the current data on R(D), $$R(D^*)$$ R(D∗) , $$P_\tau (D^*)$$ Pτ(D∗) , $$R(J/\psi )$$ R(J/ψ) , and $$R(X_c)$$ R(Xc) , we obtain eleven most trustworthy scenarios, each of which can provide a good explanation of the $$R(D^{(*)})$$ R(D(∗)) anomalies at $$1\sigma $$ 1σ . To further discriminate these different scenarios, we predict thirty-one observables associated with the processes considered under each NP scenario. It is found that most of the scenarios can be differentiated from each other by using these observables and their correlations.

Theoretical corrections of R_D and R_D^*

Theoretical Corrections of R_D and R_D^*

Theoretical corrections of $$R_D$$ R D and $$R_{D^*}$$ R D ∗

Theoretical corrections of <i>R<sub>D</sub></i> and <i>R<sub>D*</sub></i>

Theoretical Corrections of $R_D$ and $R_{D^*}$

Theoretical corrections of and

Two loop electroweak corrections to B̄ → X s γ and B 0 s → μ + μ − in the B-LSSM

Two Loop Electroweak Corrections to $$\bar{b}\rightarrow X_s\gamma $$ B ¯ → X S Γ and $$b_s^0\rightarrow \mu ^+\mu ^-$$ B S 0 → Μ + Μ - in the B-LSSM

R ( D ) and R ( D * ) Anomalies and Their Phenomenological Implications

Sum Rules for Semi-Leptonic B → C and B → U Decays: Accuracy Checks and Implications

B meson rare decays in the TNMSSM

The Two-Loop Corrections to Lepton MDMs and EDMs in the EBLMSSM

B → Dlνl form factors beyond leading power and extraction of |Vcb| and R(D)

b→ cτν transitions in the standard model effective field theory

({b ightarrow c au u }) transitions in the standard model effective field theory

$${B\rightarrow C\tau \nu }$$ B→cτν Transitions in the Standard Model Effective Field Theory

B→D(*)τντdecays in Two-Higgs-doublet Models

Relativistic Correction To J/Sigma Production At Hadron Colliders

Sum rules for semi-leptonic $b \to c$ and $b \to u$ decays: accuracy checks and implications

Study on Muon MDM and Lepton EDM in BLMSSM Via the Mass Insertion Approximation