Abstract:The dynamic nature of science is embodied in the growth of knowledge in magnitude and the transformation of knowledge in structure. More specifically, the growth in magnitude is indicated by a sharp increase in the number of scientific publications in recent decades. The transformation of knowledge occurs as the boundaries of scientific disciplines become increasingly less distinct, resulting in a complicated situation wherein disciplines and interdisciplinary research topics coexist and co-evolve. Knowledge production in such a context creates challenges for the measurement of science.This thesisaims to develop more flexible bibliometric methodologies in order to address some of the challenges to measuring science effectively. To be specific, this thesis1) proposes a new approach for identifying emerging research topics; 2) measuresthe interdisciplinarity of research topics; 3) explores the accuracy of the journal classification systems of the Web of Science and Scopus; 4) examines the role of cognitive distance in grant decisions; and 5) investigates the effect of cognitive distance between collaborators on their research output. The data used in this thesisaremainly from the in-house Web of Science and Scopus databases of the Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS) at Leiden University. Quantitativeanalyses, in particular bibliometric analyses,are the main research methodologies employed in this thesis. Furthermore, this thesis primarily offers methodological contributions, proposing a series of approaches designed to tackle the challenges created by the dynamics of science. While the major contribution of this dissertation lies in the improvement of certain bibliometric approaches, it also enhances the understanding of the current system of science. In particular, the approaches and research findings presented here have implications for various stakeholders, including publishing organizations, bibliographic database producers, research policy makers, and research funding agencies. Indeed, these approaches could be built into a software tool and thereby be made available to researchers beyond the field of bibliometric studies.

Unpacking the essential tension of knowledge recombination: Analyzing the impact of knowledge spanning on citation impact and disruptive innovation

Unpacking the Essential Tension of Knowledge Recombination: Analyzing the Impact of Knowledge Spanning on Citation Counts and Disruptive Innovation

Neighboring Knowledge Recombination: Knowledge Relationship Intensity, Neighboring Knowledge Concentration, and Knowledge Impact

Knowledge recombination and technological innovation: the important role of cross-disciplinary knowledge

The relationship between interdisciplinarity and citation impact-a novel perspective on citation accumulation

Untangle the Characteristics of Disruptive and Consolidating Citations of Nobel‐winning Papers

The Association Between Prior Knowledge and the Disruption of an Article

Are Disruptive Papers More Likely to Impact Technology and Society?

Recombination of Knowledge Components and Knowledge Impact: Neighboring Components Versus Distant Components

Relying on recent and temporally dispersed science predicts breakthrough inventions

Knowledge Convergence of Science and Technology in Patent Inventions

The Time Dimension of Science: Connecting the Past to the Future

The influence of proximity and knowledge base on recombination innovation in R&D collaboration

Breaking down the relationship between academic impact and scientific disruption

Team Structure and Invention Impact under High Knowledge Diversity: an Empirical Examination of Computer Workstation Industry

Cognitive Proximity, Technological Regime and Knowledge Accumulation: an Agent-Based Model of Interfirm Knowledge Exchange

Knowledge Transfer, Knowledge Gaps, and Knowledge Silos in Citation Networks

Collaboration Diversity and Scientific Impact

Surprising combinations of research contents and contexts are related to impact and emerge with scientific outsiders from distant disciplines

Heterogeneous Expertise, Knowledge Spillover and Productivity : Does Cognitive Distance in Research Collaboration Matter

Innovation Overload?