Clinical Significance of Massive Proteinuria in Primary IgA Nephropathy with and Without Nephrotic Syndrome: a Single Center Cohort Study

Ya Hu,Ziyuan Huang,Qianqian Cao,Bo Chen,Shungang Xu,Wenxian Qiu,Xiaohan You,Ji Zhang,Chaosheng Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0886022x.2023.2267138
IF: 3.222
2023-01-01
Renal Failure
Abstract:Background: Both primary IgA nephropathy (IgAN) with and without nephrotic syndrome (NS) can present massive proteinuria (24-h urinary protein >= 3.5 g/d). The clinical significance of massive proteinuria may be different in the two entities and needs further research.Methods: Data of 1870 patients with biopsy-proven IgAN in our hospital from January 2011 to December 2022 was retrospectively reviewed. A total of 242 IgAN patients with massive proteinuria were enrolled. Patients who presented with nephrotic syndrome at renal biopsy were included in the IgAN with NS cohort (IgAN-NS). The IgAN with nephrotic-range proteinuria cohort (IgAN-NR) consisted of 1:1 matched cases from the remaining according to age, gender, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at baseline, and follow-up time. The clinical and pathological characteristics between the two cohorts were analyzed.Results: The IgAN-NS had a significantly higher proteinuria level than the IgAN-NR (p < .001). Cluster analysis revealed that proteinuria was associated with lipids in IgAN-NS, while it was associated with inflammatory indicators in IgAN-NR. When the complete remission of proteinuria (CR) was not achieved, the Kaplan-Meier analysis showed the prognosis of IgAN-NS was significantly worse than that of IgAN-NR (p = .04). Then, our GLMM model and line chart showed that the serum albumin level of the IgAN-NR was always evidently higher than that of the IgAN-NS while the significant difference in urinary albumin/creatinine ratio between the two cohorts gradually disappeared during the short-term follow-up (1 year). Moreover, the Cox regression analysis showed that the increased serum albumin was an independent protective factor for the poor outcomes (eGFR decreased from the baseline >= 30% continuously or reached end-stage renal disease [ESRD]).Conclusion: The IgAN-NS had poorer clinicopathologic manifestation than IgAN-NR, including severer massive proteinuria. When the CR was not achieved, the prognosis of IgAN-NS was inferior to that of the IgAN-NR.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?