Abstract:fields of building energy code development and energy labeling programs where building simulation plays a key role, there are also confusing and misleading claims that some BEMPs are better than others. In order to address these problems, it is essential to identify and understand differences between widely-used BEMPs, and the impact of these differences on load simulation results, by detailed comparisons of these BEMPs from source code to results. The primary goal of this work was to research methods and processes that would allow a thorough scientific comparison of the BEMPs. The secondary goal was to provide a list of strengths and weaknesses for each BEMP, based on in-depth understandings of their modeling capabilities, mathematical algorithms, advantages and limitations. This is to guide the use of BEMPs in the design and retrofit of buildings, especially to support China’s building energy standard development and energy labeling program. The research findings could also serve as a good reference to improve the modeling capabilities and applications of the three BEMPs. The methodologies, processes, and analyses employed in the comparison work could also be used to compare other programs. The load calculation method of each program was analyzed and compared to identify the differences in solution algorithms, modeling assumptions and simplifications. Identifying inputs of each program and their default values or algorithms for load simulation was a critical step. These tend to be overlooked by users, but can lead to large discrepancies in simulation results. As weather data was an important input, weather file formats and weather variables used by each program were summarized. Some common mistakes in the weather data conversion process were discussed. ASHRAE Standard 140-2007 tests were carried out to test the fundamental modeling capabilities of the load calculations of the three BEMPs, where inputs for each test case were strictly defined and specified. The tests indicated that the cooling and heating load results of the three BEMPs fell mostly within the range of spread of results from other programs. Based on ASHRAE 140-2007 test results, the finer differences between DeST and EnergyPlus were further analyzed by designing and conducting additional tests. Potential key influencing factors (such as internal gains, air infiltration, convection coefficients of windows and opaque surfaces) were added one at a time to a simple base case with an analytical solution, to compare their relative impacts on load calculation results. Finally, special tests were designed and conducted aiming to ascertain the potential limitations of each program to perform accurate load calculations. The heat balance module was tested for both single and double zone cases. Furthermore, cooling and heating load calculations were compared between the three programs by varying the heat transfer between adjacent zones, the occupancy of the building, and the air-conditioning schedule.

A review of validation methods for building energy modeling programs

Urban Vitality Assessment at the Neighborhood Scale with Geo-Data: A Review Toward Implementation

Comparison of HVAC System Modeling in EnergyPlus, DeST and DOE-2.1E

Comparison of Building Energy Modeling Programs: HVAC Systems

Implementation of BIM Energy Analysis and Monte Carlo Simulation for Estimating Building Energy Performance Based on Regression Approach: A Case Study

Exploring and Verifying BIM-based Energy Simulation for Building Operations

Comparison of Building Energy Simulation Programs: DeST,EnergyPlus and DOE-2

Validation Approach for Energy Optimization Models of Grid-Interactive Buildings Using Co-Simulation

Building Energy Performance Modeling through Regression Analysis: A Case of Tyree Energy Technologies Building at UNSW Sydney

Validating 'GIS-UBEM'—A Residential Open Data-Driven Urban Building Energy Model

A detailed loads comparison of three building energy modeling programs: EnergyPlus, DeST and DOE-2.1E

A Review of Operational Energy Consumption Calculation Method for Urban Buildings

Sensitivity Assessment of Building Energy Performance Simulations Using MARS Meta-Modeling in Combination with Sobol' Method

Archetype building energy modeling approaches and applications: A review

Application and evaluation of a pattern-based building energy model calibration method using public building datasets

Evaluation of the relative differences in building energy simulation results

Data acquisition for urban building energy modeling: A review

A systematic review of methods for evaluating the thermal performance of buildings through energy simulations

Why is the Reliability of Building Simulation Limited As a Tool for Evaluating Energy Conservation Measures?

Addressing uncertainty to achieve stability in urban building energy modeling: A comparative study of four possible approaches

Use of BESTEST procedure to improve a building thermal simulation program