A Novel Web-Based Online Nomogram to Predict Advanced Liver Fibrosis in Patients with Autoimmune Hepatitis-Primary Biliary Cholangitis Overlap Syndrome

Zhiyi Zhang,Jian Wang,Yun Chen,Yiguang Li,Li Zhu,Huali Wang,Yilin Liu,Jiacheng Liu,Shengxia Yin,Xin Tong,Xiaomin Yan,Yuxin Chen,Chuanwu Zhu,Jie Li,Yuanwang Qiu,Chao Wu,Rui Huang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtauto.2023.100215
IF: 25.7
2023-01-01
Journal of Hepatology
Abstract:Background: Patients with autoimmune hepatitis-primary biliary cholangitis (AIH-PBC) overlap syndrome have a worse prognosis compared to AIH or PBC alone and accurately predicting the severity and dynamically monitoring the progression of disease are therefore essential. We aimed to develop a nomogram-based model to predict advanced liver fibrosis in patients with AIH-PBC overlap syndrome. Methods: A total of 121 patients with AIH-PBC overlap syndrome were retrospectively included and randomly assigned to a development set and a validation set. Backward stepwise regression's best model with the lowest AIC was employed to create a nomogram. Diagnose accuracy was evaluated using the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC), calibration analysis, and decision curve analysis (DCA) and was compared with aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio (APRI) and fibrosis index based on four factors-4 (FIB-4) score. Results: The median age of patients was 53.0 years (IQR: 46.0-63.0), and female patients accounted for 95.0 %. Platelets, globulin, total bilirubin, and prothrombin time were associated with advanced fibrosis (>= S3) and used to construct an AIH-PBC overlap syndrome fibrosis (APOSF)-nomogram (available online at https://ndth-zzy.sh inyapps.io/APOSF-nomogram/). The AUROCs of APOSF-nomogram were 0.845 (95 % CI: 0.754-0.936) and 0.843 (95 % CI: 0.705-0.982) in development set and validation set respectively, which was significantly better than APRI and FIB-4. Calibration revealed that the estimated risk fits well with biopsy-proven observation. DCA outperformed APRI and FIB4 in terms of net benefit, demonstrating clinical utility.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?