Ultra High B-Value Diffusion Weighted Imaging Enables Better Molecular Grading Stratification over Histological Grading in Adult-Type Diffuse Glioma.

Jiahe Guo,Xiuwei Fu,Yiming Li,Haolang Ming,Yu Lin,Shengping Yu,Huijie Wei,Cuiyun Sun,Kai Zhang,Xuejun Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.111140

IF: 4.531

2023-01-01

European Journal of Radiology

Abstract:Purpose: Accurate preoperative radiological staging of adult-type diffuse glioma is crucial for effective prognostic stratification and selection of appropriate therapeutic interventions. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps generated from ultrahigh b-value diffusionweighted imaging (DWI) for molecular grading with that for histological grading of adult-type diffuse glioma, and to evaluate the correlation between these ADC maps and molecular and histological biomarkers. Methods: This study retrospectively enrolled forty adult-type diffuse glioma patients, diagnosed using the 2021 WHO classification criteria. Preoperative imaging data, including multiple b-value DWI and conventional magnetic resonance imaging, were collected. Tumors were graded using both histological and molecular criteria. Histogram analysis was conducted to generate 14 parameters for each tumor. Receiver operating characteristic curves and the area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate tumor grading and molecular status differentiation. Analysis of histological biomarkers was performed by calculating the Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients of continuous and hierarchical variables, respectively. Results: The intensity-related parameters for molecular grading were found to be superior to those for histological grading for the identification of WHO grade 4 (WHO4) adult-type diffuse glioma. The AUC of both grading systems increased with increasing b-values, with ADC8000-based histogram parameters showing the best results (molecular grading, square root: AUC = 0.897; histological grading, median: AUC = 0.737). The intensity-related parameters could also differentiate molecular WHO4 gliomas from histologically lower-grade gliomas (ADC8000based square root: AUC = 0.919), and different ADC8000-based kurtosis was observed between molecular and histological WHO4 gliomas (AUC = 0.833). Significant correlations between the Ki-67 index and molecular status prediction for IDH, CDKN2A, and EGFR were also demonstrated. Conclusion: The histogram parameters derived from high b-value ADC maps were found to be more effective for differentiating molecular grades of WHO4 adult-type diffuse glioma than for differentiating histological grades.