Abstract:To prevent the risk of post traumatic long term sequelae of Lisfranc injury early recognition and expeditious surgical interventions are essence of need. There have been two contemplated ways of intervention, Open Reduction and Internal Fixation (ORIF) and Arthrodesis. Still, argument remains for better approach. In this study, a comprehensive search was carried out on PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane database Library , EMBASE and google scholar for studies on surgical treatment of tarsometatarsal/lisfranc injury advocated on (a) anatomic alignment (b) postoperative complication (c) re-surgery after postoperative complication (d) implant removal and (e) clinical outcome. A metaanalysis was performed by the help of basic guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). Four potential studies with 146 patient were included in current meta-analysis. None of the proposed surgery had better outcome with nonanatomic alignment, the risk ratio 1.01 [95% CI, 0.92, 1.12; Test for overall effect: Z = 0.26 (P = 0.80)]. Here risk ratio for postoperative complication was 1.31 [95% CI, 0.78, 2.20; Test for overall effect: Z = 1.04 (P = 0.30)] indicating favoring neither ORIF nor arthrodesis. In the same way risk ratio for re-surgery for postoperative complication was 0.39 [95% CI, 0.12, 1.26; Test for overall effect: Z = 1.58 (P = 0.11)]. For implant removal risk ratio was calculated to be 0.14 [95% CI, 0.04, 0.50 Test for overall effect: Z = 3.05 (P = 0.002)], which indicates frequency of hardware removal was significantly soar on ORIF group while in arthrodesis it was quite low. Statistically clinical outcome of standard mean difference was 0.54 [95% CI, -1.97, 3.05 Test for overall effect: Z = 0.42 (P = 0.67)], which indicates none of intervention was on favor. Based on the currently available statistical analysis, it was justice on the favor of arthrodesis for Lisfranc injuries in terms of anatomical alignment, implant removal, or outcome score. Arthrodesis was comparatively more beneficial for severe Lisfranc injury with complete ligamentous involvement. For further more improvements prospective randomized controlled trial will be needed with American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score.

Operative versus non-operative treatment for non-displaced Lisfranc injuries: A two-center randomized clinical trial

Open Reduction Internal Fixation vs Primary Arthrodesis for Displaced Lisfranc Injuries: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Outcome Comparison of Lisfranc Injuries Treated Through Dorsal Plate Fixation Versus Screw Fixation

Definitive Treatments for Lisfranc Injury: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Treatment of occult Lisfranc injury with open reduction and internal fixation]

[Effective Analysis of Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for the Treatment of Acute Lisfranc Joint Injury].

Lisfranc injuries with dislocation the first tarsometatarsal joint: primary arthrodesis or internal fixation (a randomized controlled trial)

Primary Arthrodesis or Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Lisfranc Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Staged Surgical Treatment of Open Lisfranc Fracture Dislocations Using an Adjustable Bilateral External Fixator: A Retrospective Review of 21 Patients.

Staged Management of Missed Lisfranc Injuries: A Report of Short‐term Results

Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment of Displaced Intra-Articular Calcaneal Fractures: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

[Effectiveness of Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Acute and Delayed Occult Lisfranc Injuries].

Open reduction combined with a variable angle foot plate for treatment of acute Lisfranc fracture-dislocation

Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment of Displaced Intra-Articular Calcaneal Fractures

Primary Arthrodesis Compared with Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Lisfranc Injuries with the First Tarsometatarsal Joint Dislocation

Functional Outcome and Patient Satisfaction After Primary vs Secondary Arthrodesis for Lisfranc Injuries: Toward a Single-Surgery Approach

Can early treatment of lisfranc injuries without planned re-intervention be safely performed

Primary Arthrodesis versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Lisfranc Joint Fracture-Dislocations in Adults: A Systematic Review

Statistical Fragility Analysis of Open Reduction Internal Fixation vs Primary Arthrodesis to Treat Lisfranc Injuries: A Systematic Review

Arthrodesis or Open Reduction Internal Fixation for Lisfranc Injuries: A Meta-analysis

Open reduction and internal fixation for treatment of Lisfranc joint injuries