Abstract:CAC on April 11 issued draft Measures to govern generative AI service provision in China. The draft Measures related to the regulation of generative AI. However, in terms of technical features(1data; 2algorithm; 3AIGC; 4forming public opinion), there are current laws and regulations(1Cybersecurity Law·Data Security Law·PIPL; 2Algorithm Regulation; 3Deepfake Regulation; 4Public Opinion Regulation). As abovementioned, China had a way to regulate generative. Nevertheless, the reason for rushing to enact the Measures is that generative AI has caused great social repercussions. China stipulates the protection of IP rights and personal information, and the prevention of monopoly of Big Tech to fill the legislative gap. A careful examination of the Measures reveals that the main purpose of enacting the Measures is not to resolve conflicts of rights. It focuses on strengthening national security in the era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Because, in the process of data processing using AI technology, information related to national security may be exposed, and users can make behaviors that threaten social order by distributing AIGC. In addition, China’s expert groups take it as a serious problem that the gap in AI skills between the US and China will fundamentally affect the national competitiveness of the two countries. In order for Chinese Big Tech to narrow the technological gap amid adverse circumstances the legislation and policies will have to be supported. From this point of view, it is difficult to see that the Measures is intended to add new regulations on generative AI. Rather, it can be seen as an attempt to strengthen the technological capabilities of Chinese Big Tech while maintaining the current level of regulation on generative AI. In addition, it implies the intention to use the Measures when a situation that threatens national security triggered by generative AI.

China's New Regulations on Generative AI: Implications for Bioethics.

Legal Regulation of Generative Artificial Intelligence in China

Appraising Regulatory Framework Towards Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) under Digital Humanism

Ethical and Regulatory Challenges of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: A Chinese Perspective

What Should ChatGPT Mean for Bioethics?

Generative artificial intelligence and ethical considerations in health care: a scoping review and ethics checklist

Research on the legal regulation of Generative Artificial intelligence—— Take ChatGPT as an example

China’s Legal Practices Concerning Challenges of Artificial General Intelligence

Generative Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Ethical Considerations and Assessment Checklist

Balancing Innovation and Regulation in the Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence

Legal regulation of generative AI: a multidimensional construction

Generative AI, learning and new literacies

A Study on China’s Generative AI Regulations

The Limitations and Ethical Considerations of ChatGPT

Ethical Considerations of Using ChatGPT in Health Care

ChatGPT in Education: Ethical Predicaments of Generative AI

Ethical Implications of ChatGPT in Higher Education: A Scoping Review

From principles to practices: the intertextual interaction between AI ethical and legal discourses

An ethical study of generative AI from the Actor-Network Theory perspective

The Impact of the Artificial Intelligence Act on ChatGPT

Regulations on Artificial Intelligence (AI): Decoding China's Approach and How India Can Learn From China