Abstract:This work has three stages. In Stage A, compile historical landslide data, create geographic spatial databases, and partition training and test sets in a 7:3 ratio; in Stage B, construct landslide susceptibility mapping) (LSM) models using XGBoost and Random Forest algorithms and assess their performance with metrics like area under the curve (AUC) to determine the optimal model for predicting landslides; and in Stage C, incorporate SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) model to rank factors and provide global interpretation for the entire region's landslides and local interpretation for a single landslide case. The aim of the present study was to assess differences in the conditioning factors and the performance of landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM), employing the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) model to gain profound insights into the intrinsic decision‐making mechanism of LSM in diverse landforms. Two typical karst erosion landforms were selected as the research areas. Based on 15 conditioning factors, LSMs for the two areas were developed using the Bayesian optimization random forest (RF) and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost). The SHAP model was used to explore the landslide formation mechanisms from both global and local perspectives. The results show that the area under the curve (AUC) values of the XGBoost models were 0.791 and 0.761, and the AUC values of the RF models were 0.844 and 0.817, in the two different landform areas, respectively. The RF model's accuracy was higher than that of the XGBoost model in both regions. In the low‐elevation hills area, the primary three conditioning factors were identified as slope, topographic relief and distance from the river. Conversely, in the microrelief and mesorelief low mountain area, the predominant conditioning factors were elevation, distance from the river and distance from the road. Both karst landform areas exhibited a high sensitivity to the distance from the river, indicating its significant interaction with other factors contributing to landslide occurrences. Notably, the RF model demonstrated superior performance compared to the XGBoost model, rendering it a more suitable choice for conducting landslide susceptibility mapping research in karst erosion landform areas. In the present study, a comprehensive explanatory framework based on the RF‐SHAP model was proposed, which enables both global and local interpretation of landslides in various karst landscapes. Such an approach explores the intrinsic decision‐making mechanism of the model, enhancing the transparency and realism of landslide susceptibility prediction results.

Explainable Machine Learning Model for Rockfall Susceptibility Evaluation

An interpretable model for the susceptibility of rainfall-induced shallow landslides based on SHAP and XGBoost

A SHAP-Enhanced XGBoost Model for Interpretable Prediction of Coseismic Landslides

An explainable AI (XAI) model for landslide susceptibility modeling

Insights into Geospatial Heterogeneity of Landslide Susceptibility Based on the SHAP-XGBoost Model

An interpretable model for landslide susceptibility assessment based on Optuna hyperparameter optimization and Random Forest

Rockfall Susceptibility Mapping Using XGBoost Model by Hybrid Optimized Factor Screening and Hyperparameter

Insights into landslide susceptibility in different karst erosion landforms based on interpretable machine learning

On the use of explainable AI for susceptibility modeling: Examining the spatial pattern of SHAP values

Rock strength prediction based on machine learning: A study from prediction model to mechanism explanation

Mapping and Interpretability of Aftershock Hazards Using Hybrid Machine Learning Algorithms

Exploring the spatial patterns of landslide susceptibility assessment using interpretable Shapley method: Mechanisms of landslide formation in the Sichuan-Tibet region

Explainable AI Integrated Feature Selection for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping using TreeSHAP

Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Based on Interpretable Machine Learning from the Perspective of Geomorphological Differentiation

SHAP-PDP Hybrid Interpretation of Decision-Making Mechanism of Machine Learning-Based Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study at Wushan District, China

Deciphering Decision-Making Mechanisms for the Susceptibility of Different Slope Geohazards: A Case Study on a SMOTE-RF-SHAP Hybrid Model

Interpretability of Statistical, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning Models for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in Three Gorges Reservoir Area

Essential insights into decision mechanism of landslide susceptibility mapping based on different machine learning models

Developing an explainable rockburst risk prediction method using monitored microseismicity based on interpretable machine learning approach

A New Method of Rockburst Prediction for Categories with Sparse Data Using Improved XGBoost Algorithm

Landslide Susceptibility Modeling Based on GIS and Novel Bagging-Based Kernel Logistic Regression