Laboratory for Cognitive Studies Inferential Reconstruction in Memory for Connected Discourse Inferential Reconstruction in Memory for Connected Discourse

R. Spiro

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Non-Abelian gauge theory on q-Quantum spaces

S. Schraml

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2172/803865

2002-08-23

Abstract:Gauge theories on q-deformed spaces are constructed using covariant derivatives. For this purpose a ''vielbein'' is introduced, which transforms under gauge transformations. The non-Abelian case is treated by establishing a connection to gauge theories on commutative spaces, i.e. by a Seiberg-Witten map. As an example we consider the Manin plane. Remarks are made concerning the relation between covariant coordinates and covariant derivatives.
On Being Sane in Insane Places

D. L. Rosenhan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.179.4070.250

IF: 56.9

1973-01-19

Science

Abstract:It is clear that we cannot distinguish the sane from the insane in psychiatric hospitals. The hospital itself imposes a special environment in which the meanings of behavior can easily be misunderstood. The consequences to patients hospitalized in such an environment—the powerlessness, depersonalization, segregation, mortification, and self-labeling—seem undoubtedly countertherapeutic. I do not, even now, understand this problem well enough to perceive solutions. But two matters seem to have some promise. The first concerns the proliferation of community mental health facilities, of crisis intervention centers, of the human potential movement, and of behavior therapies that, for all of their own problems, tend to avoid psychiatric labels, to focus on specific problems and behaviors, and to retain the individual in a relatively non-pejorative environment. Clearly, to the extent that we refrain from sending the distressed to insane places, our impressions of them are less likely to be distorted. (The risk of distorted perceptions, it seems to me, is always present, since we are much more sensitive to an individual's behaviors and verbalizations than we are to the subtle contextual stimuli that often promote them. At issue here is a matter of magnitude. And, as I have shown, the magnitude of distortion is exceedingly high in the extreme context that is a psychiatric hospital.) The second matter that might prove promising speaks to the need to increase the sensitivity of mental health workers and researchers to the Catch 22 position of psychiatric patients. Simply reading materials in this area will be of help to some such workers and researchers. For others, directly experiencing the impact of psychiatric hospitalization will be of enormous use. Clearly, further research into the social psychology of such total institutions will both facilitate treatment and deepen understanding. I and the other pseudopatients in the psychiatric setting had distinctly negative reactions. We do not pretend to describe the subjective experiences of true patients. Theirs may be different from ours, particularly with the passage of time and the necessary process of adaptation to one's environment. But we can and do speak to the relatively more objective indices of treatment within the hospital. It could be a mistake, and a very unfortunate one, to consider that what happened to us derived from malice or stupidity on the part of the staff. Quite the contrary, our overwhelming impression of them was of people who really cared, who were committed and who were uncommonly intelligent. Where they failed, as they sometimes did painfully, it would be more accurate to attribute those failures to the environment in which they, too, found themselves than to personal callousness. Their perceptions and behavior were controlled by the situation, rather than being motivated by a malicious disposition. In a more benign environment, one that was less attached to global diagnosis, their behaviors and judgments might have been more benign and effective.

multidisciplinary sciences
[Patients' perception of seclusion in psychiatry: ethical perspectives]

N Cano,L Boyer,C Garnier,A Michel,R Belzeaux,J-M Chabannes,J-C Samuelian,J-R Harle

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.encep.2010.04.013

Abstract:Objective: Although seclusion is legally sanctioned in France, its use remains controversial, and debate continues over ethical and therapeutic aspects of the practice. Seclusion continues to be widely used in the management of disturbed behaviour in hospitalized patients. Although recent studies serve to strengthen the link between the use of seclusion and negative patient responses, they are limited in extending our understanding of the seclusion experience. The objective of this work was two-fold: to examine the perceptions and experiences of patients about their seclusion experience and then suggest ways of improving the use of seclusion in relation to an ethical perspective. Method: We conducted face-to-face semi-structured interviews with inpatients in a French Public Psychiatric Hospital, 3 weeks after their seclusion. They were conducted until no new ideas emerged in the content analysis, comprising 30 patients. Interviews were conducted using an interview guide by a physician. Specific attention was paid to their perceptions of seclusion. This guide was based on the concepts of medical ethics (autonomy, beneficence, non-malfeasance). Interviews were retranscribed and content analysis was performed by two of the authors who were skilled in textual analysis. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 15.0 software. Results: Autonomy was challenged by 50% of interviewed patients. For 70% of patients, there was a lack of information and explanation during the seclusion on therapeutics, practices, procedures, expected length of time in seclusion and behaviours. This can contribute to perception of this process as punishment expressed by the patients. The dominant view of patients was that more effective communication about seclusion was needed. A majority of patients perceived the beneficence of the health professionals even if most of them did not express a benefit from this experience: only 26% believed that seclusion made them calm down and 36% that seclusion helped them to feel and behave better. The level and the quality of the relationship with staff during and following the seclusion experience was a major source of satisfaction for patients and can counter-balance their negative perception of seclusion. The non-malfeasance was questioned by patients. The therapeutic value of seclusion was not recognized by a majority of them. Seclusion from the patient's perspective appears to invoke a complex range of feelings that include helplessness (76%), anger (60%), humiliation (60%), depression (50%), and fear (63%). For 60% of patients, the act of placing them in seclusion had a profound negative impact. Seventy-six percent of them considered that seclusion could be prevented. Conclusion: Despite advances in our knowledge and understanding of mental illness, seclusion continues, and is likely to continue, as a treatment option for a number of patients. In our study, a certain number of trends were observed. Globally, there is some tension concerning ethical principles. Attention to the specific needs of patients while in seclusion may serve to reduce the punitive connotations linked to the practice. What is needed is a permanent ethical reevaluation of seclusion. For this purpose, healthcare professional staffs may be useful for a truly ethical reflection. The aim is to recognize the patient as the agent of his/her own empowerment through appropriate information. This approach should not only provide the patient with the opportunity to understand why the seclusion occurred, but also some means for overcoming the negative effects of the procedure.
[Involuntary hospitalization and treatment: the interface between psychiatry and law]

Zvi Zemishlany

Abstract:Involuntary or compulsory hospitalization and treatment of mentally ill patients is one of the most distressing societal needs. The decision to hospitalize or treat an individual involuntarily must balance between three ethical issues: the patient's right to receive medical care, the patient's personal rights to liberty and dignity, and the protection of the public. The psychiatrist is concerned with the need for medical treatment, while the courts follow the letter of the law in order to ensure protection of the individual's rights, as well as those of the public. The interaction between the psychiatric (or medical) discipline and the judicial discipline comprises inherent difficulties, due to these differences in focus of concern and due to the differences in the language they use. In the civil compulsory hospitalization, it is the definition and prediction of dangerousness that comprises a potential discourse and misunderstanding between the psychiatric and the judicial system. It seems that both systems, as well as the patients, may benefit if the initial decision to hospitalize involuntarily is taken by the medical representatives (the District Psychiatrist, Hospital Director, three physicians, etc.) as an emergency procedure. The decision to continue the involuntary hospitalization should be taken by a judicial representative (or a committee), based on the psychiatric evaluation, within 72 hours instead of the 14 days as is currently stated in the Mental Health Law. The less restrictive alternative to hospitalization, compulsory outpatient treatment, is still controversial. This is an order "with no bite" and its implementation is determined, in effect, by the patient's goodwill and cooperation. There are no legal or other consequences for patients who do not comply with the outpatient treatment order. This is true for both civil and criminal outpatient orders. Without legal sanctions this model of outpatient treatment is not really "compulsory" and does not achieve its preventive goals.
Immune checkpoint proteins: a new therapeutic paradigm for cancer--preclinical background: CTLA-4 and PD-1 blockade.

J. Weber

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.seminoncol.2010.09.005

IF: 5.385

2010-10-01

Seminars in Oncology

Abstract:Much of the recent excitement in the translational field of tumor immunology and immunotherapy has been generated by the recognition that immune checkpoint proteins can be blocked by human antibodies with profound effects in vitro, in animal tumor systems, and in patients. Promising clinical data have already been generated in melanoma and other tumor types with human antibodies directed against cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) and programmed death-1 (PD-1). The preclinical data that supported the clinical development of these two antibodies will be discussed in detail in this review, showing that many of the therapeutic effects of these two agents were predicted by the animal models, as were the immune-related side effects noted with these drugs. In contrast, much of the early work with anti-CTLA-4 antibodies indicated that it had a potent therapeutic effect only when combined with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF)-transduced tumor vaccines, and that the antibody alone was effective only in the most immunogenic tumor models in mice. Intriguingly, in patients, the drug alone clearly has had important therapeutic effects, but the addition of vaccines has not added to its clinical benefit. Murine experiments also suggested that CTLA-4 abrogation might function via important effects on natural T-regulatory cells that were CD4(+), CD25(+high), and FOXp3(+), but this has not been borne out in experiments using peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients treated with anti-CTLA-4 antibodies, and unlike in animals, in humans the exact mechanism(s) by which CTLA-4 abrogation induced an anti-tumor effect is still unclear. Abrogation of PD-1 functions via different immune signaling pathways than CTLA-4 and is likely to have a different spectrum of effects than blocking CTLA-4. For PD-1 blockade, murine experiments have suggested that the antibody alone and combined with adoptive cell transfer or vaccine approaches would be therapeutically beneficial, and that clear effects on T-cell proliferation and activation, as well as T-regulatory cell function would be observed in patients. The clinical development of anti-PD-1 antibody so far has shown that it has a potent effect when administered alone, and trials of vaccines with anti-PD-1 are just being initiated to test the idea that the predicted effects of that antibody observed in animal systems also would be seen in patients. These observations support the idea that animal preclinical therapeutic experiments are an important guide to the conduct of trials employing abrogation of immune checkpoint proteins in T cells in patients. Nonetheless, clinical investigators must be flexible and prepared to find that the biology of those systems may be very different in humans compared to mice.
Making psychiatry moral again: the role of psychiatry in patient moral development

Doug McConnell,Matthew Broome,Julian Savulescu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2022-108442

Abstract:Psychiatric involvement in patient morality is controversial. If psychiatrists are tasked with shaping patient morality, the coercive potential of psychiatry is increased, treatment may be unfairly administered on the basis of patients' moral beliefs rather than medical need, moral disputes could damage the therapeutic relationship and, in any case, we are often uncertain or conflicted about what is morally right. Yet, there is also a strong case for the view that psychiatry often works through improving patient morality and, therefore, should aim to do so. Our goal is to offer a practical and ethical path through this conflict. We argue that the default psychiatric approach to patient morality should be procedural, whereby patients are helped to express their own moral beliefs. Such a procedural approach avoids the brunt of objections to psychiatric involvement in patient morality. However, in a small subset of cases where patients' moral beliefs are sufficiently distorted or underdeveloped, we claim that psychiatrists should move to a substantive approach and shape the content of those beliefs when they are relevant to psychiatric outcomes. The substantive approach is prone to the above objections but we argue it is nevertheless justified in this subset of cases.
[Involuntary treatment of mental patients in the community: legal and ethical dilemmas]

M Mitrossili

Psychiatriki

Abstract:This article focuses on the measure of involuntary treatment of mental patients in the community, not only with regard to human rights and more specifically those of persons with mental disorders, but also with regard to ethics and deontology in mental healthcare delivery service. In this light, the important role of informed consent in psychiatry with regard to the psychiatric act is examined. Informed consent of mental patients in treatment when they are in need of voluntary or involuntary hospitalization is further examined, while emphasis is being put on the case of involuntary treatment. The Convention for Human Rights and Biomedicine (Convention of Οviedo), the European Convention of Human Rights, other documents of International Organizations (UN) and specialized national legislation (A. 2071/1992, Chapter vi, Greek law) constitute basic reference and interpretation points. The examination of consent and the demarcation of the exceptions are important issues that need to be approached. More particularly, our interest lies with the article 7 of the Convention for Human Rights and Biomedicine, which specifically refers to the protection of person who suffers from a mental disorder. The opinion that informed consent in psychiatric treatment and involuntary treatment are concepts and processes which are distinct but not always mutually exclusive is enhanced. In any case, involuntary treatment causes major dilemmas as far as informed consent in the psychiatric act is concerned, as it raises issues that affect the autonomy of the person. Today, however, there are many factors which influence public politics towards the adoption of the measure of involuntary treatment within the community. How is it that this paradoxical link is legitimized and justified: involuntary treatment and community? The enactment of the above mentioned measure in many European and North American countries has created new paths in the practice of contemporary psychiatry. Nonetheless, it continues to divide the psychiatric and legal word for it causes intense questioning from a legal, ethical, deontological and clinical aspect, as it offends fundamental rights of the individual. In a legal civilization, in which the principle of informed consent or refusal constitutes a basic rule of the lawfulness of the medical and psychiatric act, any divergence from this rule has consequences for the patients and affects a well-tempered therapeutic treatment. The above mentioned measure could be counterbalanced by the legal regulation of advance directives and the provision for the appointment of a proxy person by the mental patient.
The Psychiatric Profession: an Expertise Under Siege?

Hugo De Waal,Amit Malik,Dinesh Bhugra

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764009106259

2009-10-12

International Journal of Social Psychiatry

Abstract:Background: Psychiatry along with other medical disciplines has been under siege in the UK and the USA for a number of years and for a number of reasons. These have varied from various medical scandals and funding changes to political imperatives and public expectations. Changes in the knowledge base have added yet another dimension to this debate. Material: The subject is explored using historical figures and their writings and an overview of historic views on the psychiatry profession. Discussion: The demise of the psychiatrist as an expert and the profession of psychiatry as an expertise can be related to both real and perceived factors. Unlike, for instance, the language used by cardio-thoracic surgeons, the language used in and for professional communications in pyschiatry has become very similar to that used in lay discourses on psychological and relationship matters in the general population — partly as a result of the Freudian project successfully insinuating itself into ‘common knowledge’ and partly as the influence of media grows across the globe. This language has been misappropriated by a wide variety of non-experts, who then speak and interpret it as if they are specialists and any challenge from professionals is seen as self-protection and heresy. As psychiatrists, we do not use technology in a persuasive way as other branches of medicine tend to and this takes away a powerful symbolic conveying ‘expertise’. Increased consumerism adds yet another dimension to this discourse. Conclusions: The patient is definitely the expert on how their illness affects their life, but it is the psychiatrist who is the expert on the illness rather than simply focusing on disease. It is time for the profession loudly to proclaim itself for what it is and what it can and cannot do.

psychiatry
The clinic of solidarity with the subject of psychosis

Elan Yadin Cohen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17522439.2024.2407144

2024-09-26

Psychosis

Abstract:Embracing a history of psychoanalytic thought, this paper reimagines therapeutic practice to honor the dignity and subjectivity of persons with psychosis. Drawing on psychoanalytic perspectives, the author critiques the mechanisms that segregate individuals with severe psychiatric distress, perpetuating isolation and marginalization. Highlighting the institutional circuit that confines many to a cycle of transient care, the paper argues for a psychoanalytic clinic of solidarity that fosters genuine relationality. It critiques prevailing treatment paradigms that prioritize symptom suppression over existential engagement, advocating instead for therapeutic approaches rooted in empathetic presence and mutual recognition. Ultimately, it proposes solidarity as a foundational principle for transformative care that seeks to restore agency and belonging to persons with psychosis.

psychiatry,psychology, clinical
Ethical challenges in contemporary psychiatry: an overview and an appraisal of possible strategies and research needs

Silvana Galderisi,Paul S. Appelbaum,Neeraj Gill,Piers Gooding,Helen Herrman,Antonio Melillo,Keris Myrick,Soumitra Pathare,Martha Savage,George Szmukler,John Torous

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.21230

2024-09-16

World Psychiatry

Abstract:Psychiatry shares most ethical issues with other branches of medicine, but also faces special challenges. The Code of Ethics of the World Psychiatric Association offers guidance, but many mental health care professionals are unaware of it and the principles it supports. Furthermore, following codes of ethics is not always sufficient to address ethical dilemmas arising from possible clashes among their principles, and from continuing changes in knowledge, culture, attitudes, and socio‐economic context. In this paper, we identify topics that pose difficult ethical challenges in contemporary psychiatry; that may have a significant impact on clinical practice, education and research activities; and that may require revision of the profession's codes of ethics. These include: the relationships between human rights and mental health care, research and training; human rights and mental health legislation; digital psychiatry; early intervention in psychiatry; end‐of‐life decisions by people with mental health conditions; conflicts of interests in clinical practice, training and research; and the role of people with lived experience and family/informal supporters in shaping the agenda of mental health care, policy, research and training. For each topic, we highlight the ethical concerns, suggest strategies to address them, call attention to the risks that these strategies entail, and highlight the gaps to be narrowed by further research. We conclude that, in order to effectively address current ethical challenges in psychiatry, we need to rethink policies, services, training, attitudes, research methods and codes of ethics, with the concurrent input of a range of stakeholders, open minded discussions, new models of care, and an adequate organizational capacity to roll‐out the implementation across routine clinical care contexts, training and research.

psychiatry
Mapping the ethical aspects in end-of-life care for persons with a severe and persistent mental illness: A scoping review of the literature

Loïc Moureau,Monica Verhofstadt,Axel Liégeois

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1094038

IF: 4.7

2023-03-17

Frontiers in Psychiatry

Abstract:Persons with severe and persistent mental illness (SPMI) make up a vulnerable group within mental healthcare and society. Not only do they suffer from long-term, serious psychiatric disorders; they often also experience considerable problems in their psychosocial functioning. Research has disclosed that the care needs of this target group are complex, and that the life expectancy of these persons is significantly lower than in the general population. Given (1) the lower life expectancy of persons with SPMI, (2) the higher suicide risk related to mental disorders, and (3) the legalization and practice of medical assistance in dying in an increasing number of countries, it is of utmost importance to map the ethical aspects and challenges of end-of-life care needs in persons with SPMI. Therefore, we charted the way end-of-life care is provided for them by means of a scoping review of the scientific literature, with an emphasis on the ethical aspects surrounding it. We explore existing ethical dilemmas; the underlying ethical values, principles and attitudes; and the locus and stakeholders of ethical dialog regarding end-of-life care in persons with SPMI. The results indicate that the four guiding principles of biomedical ethics can well be identified in the literature, and are each addressed in their own specific way: Autonomy in relation to questions regarding the decision-making capacity of persons with SPMI; Justice in relation to access to quality care and the presence of stigma; and Non-maleficence and Beneficence in relation to the ongoing debate regarding the benefits and obstacles in applying palliative care approaches in the context of psychiatry, and the status of the futility-concept therein. Personal virtues and attitudes in care professionals, like compassion, non-abandonment and upholding dignity are key, as care professionals are the main advocates of persons with SPMI, which often lack an extensive social network. Further, we find that the ethical dialog is mainly focused on care professionals and relatives, rather than the persons with SPMI themselves. This is reflected in the existing research that often had the voices of the latter missing. Future research may benefit from the inclusion of persons with SMPI's first-hand accounts. End-of-life care for persons with SPMI may benefit from identifying and integrating (locally developed) good practices like cross-sectoral education, specific care models, and ethics support.

psychiatry
Change of shift. The other side.

H. Murray

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.12.021

IF: 6.762

2014-09-01

Annals of Emergency Medicine

Abstract:
Situating evaluativism in psychiatry: on the axiological dimension of phenomenological psychopathology and Fulford's value-based practice

Alessandro GuardascioneSchool of Philosophy,University College of Dublin,Dublin,Ireland

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2024.2350489

2024-05-12

Philosophical Psychology

Abstract:Evaluativists hold that psychiatric disorders have a factual and evaluative dimension and recognize that psychiatric patients have an active role in shaping their symptoms, influencing the development of their disorders, and the outcome of psychiatric therapy. This is reflected in person-centered approaches that explicitly consider the role of values in psychiatric conceptualization, classification, and decision-making. In this respect, in light of the recent partnership between Fulford's value-based practice (VBP), and Stanghellini's phenomenological-hermeneutic-dynamical (P.H.D) psychotherapy method, this paper presents a comparative analysis of two person-centered approaches to psychiatric care currently discussed within the literature. I claim that while these approaches share some core ideas, they also present important divergences concerning their axiological underpinnings, which could potentially compromise their partnership. In particular, by exploring their theoretical, practical, and ethical dimensions, I show that these models have different conceptions of what values are, which, in turn, affect their understanding of how values relate to the person and how clinicians can identify them. Finally, I argue that although Fulford's and Stanghellini's approaches are prima facie compatible and complementary, developing a "combined analytic-plus-phenomenological form of values-based practice" should address fundamental conceptual issues if it is to become a consistent and coherent method for psychiatric care.

psychology, multidisciplinary,ethics
Crime, punishment, and detention in secure psychiatric hospital

Andrew Shepherd

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00258024241256423

2024-05-24

Medicine Science and the Law

Abstract:Medicine, Science and the Law, Ahead of Print. Many legal jurisdictions offer some form of hospital diversion and disposal as an alternative to incarceration in prison for mentally disordered offenders. Such diversion is commonly understood as offering a non-punitive alternative in terms of sentencing decisions. However, complete loss of responsibility with respect to acts of violence is rare and indicative of extreme degrees of mental disorder. This raises challenges for sentencers when considering disposal options. From the perspective of the patient and healthcare providers while hospital may be framed as non-punitive, it still involves marked loss of freedom and rights. In this essay, it is argued that failure to acknowledge the punitive element, inherent in hospital detention, risks its repression, and a false dichotomy being established with prison being seen as solely punitive and hospital as solely therapeutic. It is suggested that this division is unhelpful, even potentially harmful, and that a synthesis as solution to this dialectic opposition may be generative in terms of therapeutic work in hospitals, clarification of the role of hospitals in terms of criminal justice disposal, and greater transparency in relation to multi-agency working and the social circumstances of patients detained in secure hospitals. Further work to understand this process is suggested with a particular emphasis being placed on the experience of specific groups of patients, such as women, who may find themselves in a notably precarious state within secure care.

law,medicine, legal
Male songbirds provide indirect parental care by guarding females during incubation

Bradley C Fedy,T. E. Martin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/BEHECO/ARP094

2009-09-01

Abstract:Across many taxa, guarding of fertile mates is a widespread tactic that enhances paternity assurance. However, guarding of mates can also occur during the nonfertile period, and the fitness benefits of this behavior are unclear. Male songbirds, for example, sometimes guard nonfertile females during foraging recesses from incubation. We hypothesized that guarding postreproductive mates may have important, but unrecognized, benefits by enhancing female foraging efficiency, thereby increasing time spent incubating eggs. We tested the hypothesis in 2 songbird species by examining female behavior during natural and experimentally induced absences of males. Male absence caused increased vigilance in foraging females that decreased their efficiency and resulted in less time spent incubating eggs. Male guarding of nonfertile females can thus provide a previously unrecognized form of indirect parental care. Copyright 2009, Oxford University Press.
[Examination of the differential hematocrit and the plasma viscosity under the influence of ionizing radiation].

J. Thiel,H. Böhme,R. Melzer,W. Prager

Abstract:Systematic investigations into the impact of haemorheological parameters through ionizing rays are not available in literature. The main factors influencing the flow capacity of the blood were determined in vitro by using a set of special methods. Even by using high dosages of irradiation (600 R) only those changes in the flow capacity of the blood could be identified which lay in or near the dispersion area of the methods. These investigations carried out in vitro only take into account the immediate effect of the blood and not rheological changes caused by the intact organism after irradiation.
The Hostile Hospital: Exploring Hospitality, Violence, and the Doctor-Patient Relationship

Stephen R Milford,Giorgia Lorenzini

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S389728

2024-08-14

Abstract:Lévinas and Derrida speak of the ontological context of human relationships in the context of the absolute priority of the Other and the unconditional law of hospitality. This has direct implications for doctor-patient relationships in the context of health care. This paper explores these philosophical and practical implications in light of a paradox that exists in all hospitality: that hostility is inevitably intertwined with hospitality. The paper explores three ways hostility can present in doctor-patient relationships: in physical violence, through paternalism, and through the violence of categorisation. While acknowledging the paradox, and the complexity of solutions, the paper considers ways to minimize this hostility. In so doing, it encourages HCPs to overcome whatever is possible so as to do the impossible: provide unconditional hospitality.
Philosophy of psychiatry: theoretical advances and clinical implications

Dan J. Stein,Kris Nielsen,Anna Hartford,Anne‐Marie Gagné‐Julien,Shane Glackin,Karl Friston,Mario Maj,Peter Zachar,Awais Aftab

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.21194

2024-05-11

World Psychiatry

Abstract:Work at the intersection of philosophy and psychiatry has an extensive and influential history, and has received increased attention recently, with the emergence of professional associations and a growing literature. In this paper, we review key advances in work on philosophy and psychiatry, and their related clinical implications. First, in understanding and categorizing mental disorder, both naturalist and normativist considerations are now viewed as important – psychiatric constructs necessitate a consideration of both facts and values. At a conceptual level, this integrative view encourages moving away from strict scientism to soft naturalism, while in clinical practice this facilitates both evidence‐based and values‐based mental health care. Second, in considering the nature of psychiatric science, there is now increasing emphasis on a pluralist approach, including ontological, explanatory and value pluralism. Conceptually, a pluralist approach acknowledges the multi‐level causal interactions that give rise to psychopathology, while clinically it emphasizes the importance of a broad range of "difference‐makers", as well as a consideration of "lived experience" in both research and practice. Third, in considering a range of questions about the brain‐mind, and how both somatic and psychic factors contribute to the development and maintenance of mental disorders, conceptual and empirical work on embodied cognition provides an increasingly valuable approach. Viewing the brain‐mind as embodied, embedded and enactive offers a conceptual approach to the mind‐body problem that facilitates the clinical integration of advances in both cognitive‐affective neuroscience and phenomenological psychopathology.

psychiatry
Turning Sexual Science Into News: Sex Research and the Media

K. McBride,S. Sanders,E. Janssen,M. Grabe,J. Bass,Johnny V. Sparks,Trevor R. Brown,J. Heiman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490701586722

2007-10-26

Abstract:In this article we report on the findings of a two-part project investigating contemporary issues in sexuality researchers' interaction with journalists. The goal of the project was to explore best practices and suggest curricular and training initiatives for sexuality researchers and journalists that would enhance the accurate dissemination of sexuality research results in the media. We present the results of a survey of a convenience sample of 94 sexuality researchers about their experiences and concerns regarding media coverage and a summary of the main themes that emerged from an invitational conference of sexuality researchers and journalists. In addition, we present some preliminary recommendations for training and best practices. Topics assessed include reporting accuracy; sex researchers' comfort with various topics, media, and journalists; researchers' perceptions of the purpose and content of articles; concern about the impact of media coverage; and training for sexuality researchers.
The mentally ill and social exclusion: a critical examination of the use of seclusion from the patient's perspective

Dave Holmes,Suzanne L Kennedy,Amélie Perron

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840490472101

Abstract:Nurses in psychiatric settings have an important role to play in the application of seclusion, a measure that continues to be a frequently used intervention for the management of disturbing patient behaviours. Albeit a controversial measure, isolating patients remains a common institutional practice that has received widespread attention from a political, ethical, legal, and clinical standpoint. Although there is an abundance of scientific work on the subject, few studies have examined the experience of patients being confined. In order to improve the quality of nursing care surrounding this measure it appeared essential to obtain data on patients' perspectives, information deemed valuable in orienting nursing interventions. This qualitative study, guided by a phenomenological research design, aimed at describing and gaining a better understanding of patients with a severe and persistent psychiatric disorder who were placed in a seclusion room while hospitalized on a closed psychiatric unit. Using a semi-structured, non-directive interview format, a total of six patients participated in this study. Content analysis of participants' narratives yielded three main themes that appeared to be central to their experience of seclusion: their experience of seclusion on an emotional level, their perception of this intervention, and how they coped during their stay in the seclusion room. Major findings emerging from this nursing study centred on the following dimensions: patients' perceptions of seclusion as a punitive measure and a modality for social control and, the experience of seclusion serving as an intensification of already existing feelings of exclusion, rejection, abandonment, and isolation. In addition the findings also suggest that it is not seclusion per se that impacts on their negative perception and negative emotional experience but rather the lack of nurse-patient contact during the seclusion experience. Furthermore, whether patients coped by regressing, acting out, or taking on a more compliant stance, they appeared to be motivated by a need to connect with staff. This points to the importance of the relational aspects of nursing care when applying this restrictive measure. A need for modifying the institutional culture surrounding seclusion and transforming nursing practices are discussed as are future research endeavours.

Laboratory for Cognitive Studies Inferential Reconstruction in Memory for Connected Discourse Inferential Reconstruction in Memory for Connected Discourse

Non-Abelian gauge theory on q-Quantum spaces

On Being Sane in Insane Places

[Patients' perception of seclusion in psychiatry: ethical perspectives]

[Involuntary hospitalization and treatment: the interface between psychiatry and law]

Immune checkpoint proteins: a new therapeutic paradigm for cancer--preclinical background: CTLA-4 and PD-1 blockade.

Making psychiatry moral again: the role of psychiatry in patient moral development

[Involuntary treatment of mental patients in the community: legal and ethical dilemmas]

The Psychiatric Profession: an Expertise Under Siege?

The clinic of solidarity with the subject of psychosis

Ethical challenges in contemporary psychiatry: an overview and an appraisal of possible strategies and research needs

Mapping the ethical aspects in end-of-life care for persons with a severe and persistent mental illness: A scoping review of the literature

Change of shift. The other side.

Situating evaluativism in psychiatry: on the axiological dimension of phenomenological psychopathology and Fulford's value-based practice

Crime, punishment, and detention in secure psychiatric hospital

Male songbirds provide indirect parental care by guarding females during incubation

[Examination of the differential hematocrit and the plasma viscosity under the influence of ionizing radiation].

The Hostile Hospital: Exploring Hospitality, Violence, and the Doctor-Patient Relationship

Philosophy of psychiatry: theoretical advances and clinical implications

Turning Sexual Science Into News: Sex Research and the Media

The mentally ill and social exclusion: a critical examination of the use of seclusion from the patient's perspective