Job Stressors, Job Performance, Job Dedication, and the Moderating Effect of Conscientiousness: A Mixed-Method Approach
Cong Liu,Ying Liu,Mauro. J. Mills,Jinyan Fan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034841
2013-01-01
International Journal of Stress Management
Abstract:Using a mixed-method approach, we examined job stressors, job peiformance, an organizational citizenship behavior (i.e., job dedication), and the moderating effect of conscientiousness. Data were collected from 487 municipal law-enforcing officers from Beijing, China. Using a qualitative approach, we collected 150 stressful incident descriptions, which were classified into nine stressor categories. Among these nine stressors, workload, job complexity, new work environment, sudden event, and performance evaluation were classified as challenge stressors, and role stressors, interpersonal conflict, organizational constraints, and danger at work were classified as hindrance stressors. We found that employees who reported challenge stressors had more increased job peiformance (chi(2) = 22.87, df = 4, p < .001) and were more dedicated (chi(2) = 45.05, df = 26, p = .01) than employees who reported hindrance stressors. Using quantitative approach, we found that challenge stressor positively predicted job performance (b = .13, p = .06) and job dedication (b = .18, p < .01), whereas hindrance stressor negatively predicted job performance (b = -.27, p < .001) and job dedication (b = -.18, p < .001). The quantitative data also revealed that employees' conscientiousness level moderated hindrance stressor in relations to both job performance (b = -.34, p < .001) and dedication (b = -.24, p < .001). Hindrance stressor was more strongly negatively related to job performance and dedication for employees high in conscientiousness than for employees low in conscientiousness. This study provides support for the continuing interests and research of challenge and hindrance stressors.