Genesis and depositional environment of the Carboniferous Baishanquan iron deposit in Eastern Tianshan, Northwestern China

Xiuqing Yang,Jingwen Mao,Changzhi Wu,Zhiquan Li,Kurt O. Konhauser,Baoyun Chen,Guowei Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2023.107304
IF: 3.5
2023-01-01
Lithos
Abstract:Submarine volcanic-hosted iron deposits are the most important iron deposit in Northwestern China. However, their origin remains controversial. Here, we present detailed studies of the petrology, geochronology, geochemistry and Fe-Si isotopes of iron ores from Baishanquan deposit in Eastern Tianshan, Northwestern China. Similar to Precambrian banded iron formations (BIFs), the Baishanquan deposit is hosted in a volcanic-sedimentary succession, the iron ores are characterized by banding with alternate iron-rich and silica-rich layers, and the mineral assemblage is dominant by magnetite, quartz and Fe-silicates. The iron ores show distinct light rare earth elements (REE) depletion [(La/Yb)(PAAS) = 0.24-0.47], no significant Eu anomalies (Eu/Eu* = 0.88-1.16), relatively high Y/Ho ratios (30-34), and delta Si-30 values in quartz from the iron ores ranging from -0.80 to 1.67 parts per thousand. These data indicate mixed seawater and low-temperature submarine hydrothermal source for both the iron and silica. The absence of negative Ce anomalies suggests that the depositional environment was characterized by low oxygen conditions similar to modern oxygen minimum zones. Positive delta Fe-56 values in most magnetite (0.45 to +1.02 parts per thousand) suggest partial Fe(II) oxidation of the iron ores. Interestingly, the iron ores also contain relatively high Al2O3, CaO, MgO, and Zr concentrations, indicating that the sedimentary basin was subject to periodic clastic input. Indeed, zircon LA-ICP-MS U-Pb dating of interlayered dacite indicates that the Baishanquan volcanic-sedimentary rocks and associated iron ores were deposited at 327.3 +/- 2.8 Ma (N = 25, MSWD = 0.52). This is significant because the appearance of these iron deposit provides direct evidence that marine ferruginous conditions - at least locally - may have still been present at Carboniferous period.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?