Photophysical Properties of Several Multi-Branched Oligomers: an Ultrafast Excited State Dynamics and Quantum Chemical Calculation Study

Ding Zhang,Weikang Liu,Shuhui Yin,Guiqiu Wang,Dajun Liu,Qiang Fang,Yaochuan Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/s0218863523500790
2023-01-01
Journal of Nonlinear Optical Physics & Materials
Abstract:Multi-branched oligomers F1, F2 and F3 were investigated by spectroscopic experiments as well as quantum chemical calculations to elucidate the structure-property relationships and intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) characteristics of typical nonlinear optical materials. A better ICT property of F2 is obtained by replacing terminal electron donors with stronger electron-donating ability. The degree of ICT is effectively increased, which can be clearly seen from the frontier molecular orbitals contribution of central anthracene between HOMO and LUMO. The central group plays a major role in the direction as well as effective path of ICT process. In the X-shaped oligomers with anthracene as central group, ICT process takes place from terminal groups of 1, 8 position branches, to the central anthracene group. However, the electron distribution as well as the ICT of tri-branched oligomer F3 with triazine as central group is not symmetric. ICT process of F3 takes place from terminal triphenylamine groups to the central triazine and two fluorene groups at 4, 6 position branches. Y-shaped oligomer F3 has a longer lifetime of ICT state as well as a higher fluorescence quantum yield, which is consistent with the results of time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy. Z-scan results show that the TPA cross-section value of F3 is 10.6 and 2.9 times higher than that of X-shaped F1 and F2. The dynamics curves of transient absorption spectroscopy also indicate that oligomer F3 structure has relatively stronger ICT properties. To verify the substituent effect, two linear molecules F4 and F5 were also calculated. The quantum chemical calculations result shows that the branches at positions 4 and 11 of the central anthracene group have little effect on the electron cloud distribution, and there are indeed significant differences in the contributions of branches at different positions. Our results may provide some reference for molecular design.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?