Abstract:While power-relationship commitment theory in relationship marketing area has been established well in the west literature, few studies examine the robustness of it in the Chinese context with a different culture. The generalization of power-relationship commitment theory in supply chain triple relationships may also extend our knowledge in this important area. Most of the previous studies on power-relationship commitment only investigated the relationship between two major types of power and one or two types of relationship commitment in the dyadic inter-organizational relationships. Five types of power used by the suppliers or customers and their impacts on manufacturers’ two types of relationship commitment are examined based on 617 manufacturing companies in Chinese supply chains. The influence of two types of relationship commitment on supply chain performance is also investigated in this study from the perspectives of both suppliers and customers. The results indicate that the impacts of customers’ use of power on relationship commitment are different from the impacts of suppliers’ use of power. Suppliers’ use of expert and reward power increases manufacturers’ both normative and instrumental relationship commitment. But, suppliers’ use of coercive power decreases manufacturers’ normative relationship commitment. In contrast, Customers’ use of expert power, referent power and reward power has a positive impact on manufacturers’ normative relationship commitment, but customers’ use of coercive power has a negative impact. Customers’ use of reward power and coercive power has a positive effect on manufacturers’ instrumental relationship commitment, but customers’ use of legitimate power has a negative effect. Except for expert power, customers’ use of power is more effective to influence manufacturers’ relationship commitment than suppliers’ use of power. The results also reveal that normative relationship commitment improve supply chain performance directly.

The Effect of Relational Investments on Supply Chain Quality Integration: Protection or Constraint of Legal Bonds?

Supply Chain Quality Integration: Relational Antecedents and Operational Consequences

The Impact of Relational Capital on Supplier Quality Integration and Operational Performance

The impact of institutional pressures on supplier integration and financial performance: Evidence from China

The Impact of Relationship Commitment on Supply Chain Integration and Company Performance

The Effect of Buyer Digital Capability Advantage on Supplier Unethical Behavior: A Moderated Mediation Model of Relationship Transparency and Relational Capital

The Impact Of Dependence And Relationship Commitment On Logistics Outsourcing Empirical Evidence From Greater China

Empirical Research on Effects of Supply Chain Relational Capital on Purchasing Performance

The impact of dependence and relationship commitment on logistics outsourcing

The Impact of Power on Relationship Commitment in Supply Chains

The Impact Of Dependence And Trust On Supply Chain Integration

Supply chain integration and performance: The effects of long-term relationships, information technology and sharing, and logistics integration

3PL Integration:Relational Antecedents and Operational Consequences

Green supply chain management for operational performance: anteceding impact of corporate social responsibility and moderating effects of relational capital

The impact of relational capital on green supply chain management and financial performance

Effect of Customer Power on Supply Chain Integration and Performance

Supplier integration and firm performance: the moderating effects of internal integration and trust

Effects of Supply Chain Integration and Market Orientation on Firm Performance: Evidence from China

Barriers to Third-Party Logistics Integration: Empirical Evidence from China

The effects of trust and coercive power on supplier integration

Supply chain network structures and firm financial performance: the moderating role of international relations