Abstract:History reveals that human societies have suffered in terms of social justice due to cognitive bias. Semantic bias tends to amplify cognitive bias. Therefore, the presence of cognitive biases in extensive historical data can potentially result in unethical and allegedly inhumane predictions since AI systems are trained on this data. The innovation of artificial intelligence and its rapid integration across disciplines has prompted questions regarding the subjectivity of the technology. Current research focuses the semantic bias in legal judgment to increase the legitimacy of training data. By the application of general-purpose Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms, we classify and detect the semantics bias that is present in the Chinese Artificial Intelligence and Law (CAIL) dataset. Our findings demonstrate that AI models acquire superior prediction power in the CAIL dataset, which is comprised of hundreds of cases, compared to a structured professional risk assessment tool. To assist legal practitioners during this process, innovative approaches that are based on AI may be implemented inside the legal arena. To accomplish this objective, we suggested a classification model for semantic bias that is related to the classification and identification of semantic biases in legal judgment. Our proposed model legal field uses the example of categorization along with the identification of the CAIL dataset. This will be accomplished by identifying the semantics biases in judicial decisions. We used different types of classifiers such as the Support Vector Machine (SVM), Naïve-Bayes (NB), Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), and the K-Nearest Neighbour (KNN) to come across the preferred results. SVM got 96.90 %, NB has 88.80 %, MLP has 86.75 % and KNN achieved 85.66 % accuracy whereas SVM achieved greater accuracy as compared to other models. Additionally, we demonstrate that we were able to get a relatively high classification performance when predicting outcomes based just on the semantic bias categorization in judicial judgments that determine the outcome of the case.

Automatic Discovery of Controversial Legal Judgments by an Entropy-Based Measurement (S).

Automatically Classify Chinese Judgment Documents Utilizing Machine Learning Algorithms

Semantic Matching of Legal Cases for large Scale Judgments of China

An Empirical Study of Law Articles Prediction on Transportation Legal Cases

Analyzing Hong Kong's Legal Judgments from a Computational Linguistics point-of-view

Automatic Judgment Prediction via Legal Reading Comprehension

'This Crime is Not That Crime'-Classification and evaluation of four common crimes

Legal Judgment Prediction with Multiple Perspectives on Civil Cases

A Deep Learning Method for Judicial Decision Support

Knowledge is Power: Understanding Causality Makes Legal judgment Prediction Models More Generalizable and Robust

NeurJudge: A Circumstance-aware Neural Framework for Legal Judgment Prediction.

Distinguish Confusion in Legal Judgment Prediction via Revised Relation Knowledge

Artificial intelligence in judicial adjudication: Semantic biasness classification and identification in legal judgement (SBCILJ)

SEMDR: A Semantic-Aware Dual Encoder Model for Legal Judgment Prediction with Legal Clue Tracing

Legal Judgment Prediction Via Topological Learning

Data Quality for Deep Learning of Judgment Documents: an Empirical Study

Checking the Statutes in Chinese Judgment Document Based on Editing Distance Algorithm.

Automatically Classifying Chinese Judgment Documents Using Character-Level Convolutional Neural Networks

Legal Judgment Prediction via Heterogeneous Graphs and Knowledge of Law Articles

Humans or LLMs as the Judge? A Study on Judgement Biases

LA-MGFM: A legal judgment prediction method via sememe-enhanced graph neural networks and multi-graph fusion mechanism