Abstract:Counterfactual explanations provide explanations by exploring the changes in effect caused by changes in cause. They have attracted significant attention in recommender system research to explore the impact of changes in certain properties on the recommendation mechanism. Among several counterfactual recommendation methods, item-based counterfactual explanation methods have attracted considerable attention because of their flexibility. The core idea of item-based counterfactual explanation methods is to find a minimal subset of interacted items (i.e., short length) such that the recommended item would topple out of the top-K recommendation list once these items have been removed from user interactions (i.e., good quality). Usually, explanations are generated by ranking the precomputed importance of items, which fails to characterize the true importance of interacted items due to separation from the explanation generation. Additionally, the final explanations are generated according to a certain search strategy given the precomputed importance. This indicates that the quality and length of counterfactual explanations are deterministic; therefore, they cannot be balanced once the search strategy is fixed. To overcome these obstacles, this study proposes learning-based counterfactual explanations for recommendation (LCER) to provide counterfactual explanations based on personalized recommendations by jointly modeling the factual and counterfactual preference. To achieve consistency between the computation of importance and generation of counterfactual explanations, the proposed LCER endows an optimizable importance for each interacted item, which is supervised by the goal of counterfactual explanations to guarantee its credibility. Because of the model’s flexibility, the trade-off between quality and length can be customized by setting different proportions. The experimental results on four real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed LCER over several state-of-the-art baselines, both quantitatively and qualitatively.

Prototype-Guided Counterfactual Explanations via Variational Auto-encoder for Recommendation

CETD: Counterfactual Explanations by Considering Temporal Dependencies in Sequential Recommendation

Learning-based Counterfactual Explanations for Recommendation

Reinforced Path Reasoning for Counterfactual Explainable Recommendation

Counterfactual Explanations for Sequential Recommendation with Temporal Dependencies.

Toward Explainable Recommendation Via Counterfactual Reasoning.

Rule-guided Counterfactual Explainable Recommendation

Attention Is Not the Only Choice: Counterfactual Reasoning for Path-Based Explainable Recommendation

A Counterfactual Explanation Method Based on Modified Group Influence Function for Recommendation

Learning to Counterfactually Explain Recommendations

Causality-based Counterfactual Explanation for Classification Models

Counterfactual Explanation via Search in Gaussian Mixture Distributed Latent Space

A Tag-Based Post-Hoc Framework for Explainable Conversational Recommendation.

Counterfactual Explainable Conversational Recommendation

CUBE: Causal Intervention-Based Counterfactual Explanation for Prediction Models

Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanations

SVCE: Shapley Value Guided Counterfactual Explanation for Machine Learning-Based Autonomous Driving

Counterfactual Explanation Generation with Minimal Feature Boundary

Explaining Recommendation System Using Counterfactual Textual Explanations

From Intrinsic to Counterfactual: On the Explainability of Contextualized Recommender Systems

Counterfactual Explanation for Fairness in Recommendation