Abstract:Purpose To evaluate isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) status in clinically diagnosed grade II~IV glioma patients using the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification based on MRI parameters. Materials and Methods One hundred and seventy-six patients with confirmed WHO grade II~IV glioma were retrospectively investigated as the study set, including lower-grade glioma (WHO grade II, n = 64; WHO grade III, n = 38) and glioblastoma (WHO grade IV, n = 74). The minimum apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCmin) in the tumor and the contralateral normal-appearing white matter (ADCn) and the rADC (ADCmin to ADCn ratio) were defined and calculated. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis was carried out to evaluate interobserver and intraobserver agreement for the ADC measurements. Interobserver agreement for the morphologic categories was evaluated by Cohen’s kappa analysis. The nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test was used to determine whether the ADC measurements and glioma subtypes were related. By univariable analysis, if the differences in a variable were significant (P<0.05) or an image feature had high consistency (ICC >0.8; κ >0.6), then it was chosen as a predictor variable. The performance of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was evaluated using several machine learning models, including logistic regression, support vector machine, Naive Bayes and Ensemble. Five evaluation indicators were adopted to compare the models. The optimal model was developed as the final model to predict IDH status in 40 patients with glioma as the subsequent test set. DeLong analysis was used to compare significant differences in the AUCs. Results In the study set, six measured variables (rADC, age, enhancement, calcification, hemorrhage, and cystic change) were selected for the machine learning model. Logistic regression had better performance than other models. Two predictive models, model 1 (including all predictor variables) and model 2 (excluding calcification), correctly classified IDH status with an AUC of 0.897 and 0.890, respectively. The test set performed equally well in prediction, indicating the effectiveness of the trained classifier. The subgroup analysis revealed that the model predicted IDH status of LGG and GBM with accuracy of 84.3% (AUC = 0.873) and 85.1% (AUC = 0.862) in the study set, and with the accuracy of 70.0% (AUC = 0.762) and 70.0% (AUC = 0.833) in the test set, respectively. Conclusion Through the use of machine-learning algorithms, the accurate prediction of IDH-mutant versus IDH-wildtype was achieved for adult diffuse gliomas via noninvasive MR imaging characteristics, including ADC values and tumor morphologic features, which are considered widely available in most clinical workstations.

Deep Wavelet Scattering Orthogonal Fusion Network for Glioma IDH Mutation Status Prediction.

Convolutional neural network to predict IDH mutation status in glioma from chemical exchange saturation transfer imaging at 7 Tesla

Non-invasive classification of IDH mutation status of gliomas from multi-modal MRI using a 3D convolutional neural network

Multi-scale feature fusion for prediction of IDH1 mutations in glioma histopathological images

Machine learning reveals multimodal MRI patterns predictive of isocitrate dehydrogenase and 1p/19q status in diffuse low- and high-grade gliomas

Automated Machine-Learning Framework Integrating Histopathological and Radiological Information for Predicting IDH1 Mutation Status in Glioma

Predicting isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation status in glioma using structural brain networks and graph neural networks

Predicting IDH Mutation Status in Low-Grade Gliomas Based on Optimal Radiomic Features Combined with Multi-Sequence Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Using Radiomics Based on Multicenter Magnetic Resonance Images to Predict Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Mutation Status of Gliomas.

MRI-based classification of IDH mutation and 1p/19q codeletion status of gliomas using a 2.5D hybrid multi-task convolutional neural network

Predicting IDH mutation status as well as Ki-67 and p53 expression in high-grade gliomas using amide proton transfer-weighted and arterial spin labeling MRI

Multi-modal learning for predicting the genotype of glioma

Multimodal MRI Image Decision Fusion-Based Network for Glioma Classification

Noninvasive Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 1 Status Prediction in Grade II/III Glioma Based on Magnetic Resonance Images: A Transfer Learning Strategy

Deep Learning Can Differentiate IDH-Mutant from IDH-Wild GBM

Combination of MRI-based prediction and CRISPR/Cas12a-based detection for IDH genotyping in glioma

MRI Radiomic Features to Predict IDH1 Mutation Status in Gliomas: A Machine Learning Approach using Gradient Tree Boosting

Predictive Role of the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and MRI Morphologic Features on IDH Status in Patients With Diffuse Glioma: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study

GlioPredictor: a deep learning model for identification of high-risk adult IDH-mutant glioma towards adjuvant treatment planning

Deep Learning based Radiomics (DLR) and its usage in noninvasive IDH1 prediction for low grade glioma

Structural- and DTI- MRI enable automated prediction of IDH Mutation Status in CNS WHO Grade 2–4 glioma patients: a deep Radiomics Approach